Open Access

Effects of forage level and chromium-methionine chelate supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and blood metabolites in Korean native (Hanwoo) steers

  • Kyung-Il Sung1,
  • Jalil Ghassemi Nejad1,
  • Seok-Man Hong1,
  • Sang-Jip Ohh1,
  • Bae-Hun Lee1,
  • Jing-Lun Peng1,
  • Do-Hyeon Ji1 and
  • Byong-Wan Kim1Email author
Journal of Animal Science and Technology201557:14

DOI: 10.1186/s40781-015-0043-7

Received: 11 September 2014

Accepted: 19 January 2015

Published: 21 March 2015


A feeding trial was carried out to determine the effects of chromium methionine (Cr-Met) chelate and forage level over two years, 1st fattening and 2nd fattening period on growth parameters, carcass characteristics and blood metabolites of 46 Korean native (Hanwoo, Bos Taurus, BW = 183 ± 44 kg) steers. Treatments were: 1) Steers in the low forage (LF) group were fed diets that consisted of 60% concentrate and 40% forage; 2) Steers in the high forage (HF) group were fed diets that consisted of 40% concentrate and 60% forage. Following the 1st fattening period, steers (BW = 480 ± 37.6 kg) were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: LF (40 F plus no Cr-Met supplementation in the 2nd fattening period), LFCM (40LF plus added 400 ppb of Cr-Met during the 2nd fattening period), HF (60 F plus no added Cr-Met during the 2nd fattening period) and HFCM (60 F plus added 400 ppb of Cr-Met in the 2nd fattening period). Dry matter intake of the treatment diets did not differ during the raising and 1th fattening period (P > 0.05). The ADG in the raising period showed no difference between the 40 F and 60 F groups (P > 0.05). Carcass characteristics including rib-eye area and meat yield index were higher in HF than the other treatment groups (P < 0.05). The HF group tended to show a higher (P = 0.08) marbling score than the LF group whereas the HFCM group showed a higher marbling score than the LFCM group (P < 0.05). HDL was higher and LDL lower in groups fed with Cr-Met than in other groups whereas glucose showed the lowest value in HF group (P < 0.05). Triglyceride (TG), Cholesterol, PUN and total protein (TP) were the same among all treatment groups (P > 0.05). The Insulin concentration in the blood was significantly higher for the HFCM group than for the LF, LFCM and HF groups (P < 0.05). It is concluded that supplementation of chromium-methionine chelate could improve meat quality in beef steers.


Blood metabolites Carcass characteristics Chromium methionine Forage level Hanwoo steers


Chromium is known to be partially liable in blood cholesterol regulation. Chromium-Met chelate absorbs directly through the intestinal cell membrane in an intact form [1]. Therefore, availability of Cr-Met chelate remains high [2]. Chromium is an essential trace mineral that has a principal role in glucose, protein and fat metabolisms in animal tissues [3]. Chromium supplementation of diets has been demonstrated to improve performance and decrease stress conditions in cattle. Cr supplementation has also been employed to manipulate the quality of meat due to its biological function on body fat and muscle metabolism [4], however, factors such as the level of Cr supplementation, nutrients, chromium levels in basal diet, breed and species may intervene with these functions. Therefore, a dietary Cr-Met chelate supplementation was suggested as a new approach for production of low-fat and low-cholesterol meat from meat producing animals [3,5]. Wang et al. [6] reported that chromium supplementation impacts blood metabolites and improves carcass quality in swine. Moreover, chromium increases glucose tolerance by boosting insulin function, resulting in decrease of postprandial sugar level in blood [7]. In addition, Organic forms of chromium, such as yeast culture containing high Cr concentration, are usually more absorbable than inorganic forms [8]. Other organic forms of chromium, such as chromium propionate or chromium-methionine, have shown consistent positive effects on glucose metabolism, feed intake, and milk production in dairy cattle compared with other chromium compounds [9-11].

Furthermore, forage level in diets is influential for meat production and meat quality throughout the growing and fattening of beef steers [12,13]. Optimal level of forage in diets is dependent on mineral supplementation strategy. In high fiber diets, feeding grain as an energy source can suppress forage digestion [12].

Song et al. [3] reported that supplementation of Cr-Met Chelate improved carcass characteristics and performance of Holstein steers. However, the impact of forage level and Cr-Met supplementation over the periods (growing, 1th fattening and 2nd fattening period) on Hanwoo steers production has not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the carcass characteristics and growth parameters of Hanwoo steers fed with Cr-Met chelate supplement in two stages. This continuous study aimed to investigate interaction between fiber levels in early feeding period and Cr-Met chelate supplementation in late fattening period.


Experimental period, animals, and treatments assignation

The experiment took place over 13 months and was located in Gangwon province in South Korea. The animal body weight was 183 ± 44 kg and 46 Korean native steers were used in this experiment. The experiment was conducted to inspect the effect of high and low levels of forage in diet on growth performance during the raising and 1st fattening period (14-22 month age for Hanwoo). Treatments were: 1) Steers in the low forage (LF) group were fed diets that consisted of 60% concentrate and 40% forage (40 F) during the raising period and then ad libitum feeding of concentrate on the 1st fattening period; 2) Steers in high forage (HF) group were fed 40% concentrate and 60% forage (60 F) diets during the raising period and then ad libitum feeding of concentrate on the 1st fattening period. Throughout the raising and 1st fattening period steers were randomly allotted to one of two dietary treatments based on birth date and body weight.

The experiment was continued by investigating the effects of forage level and Cr-Met on carcass characteristics and blood metabolites in the 2nd fattening period (23-30 month age for Hanwoo) of Korean beef steers. Upon completion of the 1st fattening period, the steers with average body weights of 480 ± 37.6 kg were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: LF (40 F plus no added Cr-Met in the 2nd fattening period), LFCM (40 F plus added 400 ppb of Cr-Met in the 2nd fattening period), HF (60 F plus no added Cr-Met during the 2nd fattening period) and HFCM (60 F plus added 400 ppb of Cr-Met in the 2nd fattening period).

Experimental procedure

Forty-six Korean native steers with an average initial weight of 183 ± 44 kg were used in this trial. Table 1 demonstrates the ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental feed. Feed in the raising period in 40 F included concentrate and rice straw ad libitum with 1 kg alfalfa (as-fed). In the 60 F concentrate 2 to 5 kg (as-fed) and bermudagrass hay ad libitum. Then, in the 1st fattening period (14-22 months for Hanwoo) in 40 F and 60 F both concentrate and rice straw ad libitum. The experimental design in the 2nd fattening period (23-30 months for Hanwoo) was done in two levels of forage with and without Cr-Met. 40 F in the raising and 1st fattening period + concentrate without (LF) and with (LFCM) Cr-Met. Also 60 F in the raising and 1st fattening period + concentrate without (HF) and with (HFCM) Cr-Met. The experimental procedure and methods were approved by the animal welfare and ethics authority of Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Table 1

Mean feed value of feed ingredients in the experimental diet








% of DM






















Alfalfa hay







Bermudagrass hay







Rice straw







1)Raising period.

2)1st fattening period.

3)2nd fattening period.

Measurements and sampling

Feed was collected once per month, and disclosures of the common feed ingredients were analyzed according to the methods of AOAC [14]. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents were analyzed using Goering and Van Soest [15].

Each day at 09:00 am feed intake was measured by subtracting the amount of residue and was calculated by dividing two numbers. Body weight was measured every 60 days from the beginning of the experiment and a total of 7 measurements were calculated by dividing the days (initial body weight, I to VI). Average daily weight gain was measured subsequently.

Upon the completion of the feedlot experiment, the steers were slaughtered. Post-fasting weights and carcass weight, after a 24 hour chilling period in a cold room (2°C) were recorded followed by determination of back fat thickness (mm), rib-eye area (cm2), meat yield index, quantity grade, marbling score, meat color, fat color, texture, maturity, and quantity grade. Carcass characteristics were measured based on MIFAFF [16].

Blood samples were collected from the jugular by venipunture containing anticoagulant (Sodium heparin) for plasma separation. Collected blood was then centrifuged at 2500 × g for 15 minutes and the samples were stored at −20°C until tested. Plasma samples were later analyzed by using the automatic blood analyzer (Express Plus, Ciba-Coming, CA, USA) to measure the concentrations of triglyceride, cholesterol, HDL, LDL, glucose, PUN, total Protein, albumin, creatinine, calcium, and insulin.


A completely randomized design was used in this experiment. For the 2nd fattening period, beef steers were allotted to treatment groups based on completely randomized design with 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. In this study main effects were significant and no interaction between level of forage and Cr-Methionine chelate was found. Therefore, interaction data was not shown in Tables. Statistical analysis for all parameters (growth and carcass characteristics) was conducted using the GLM procedure of SAS [17]. Significant differences were tested by Duncan’s multiple tests [18], carried out at a level of 5%, and differences among means with 0.05 < P < 0.10 was accepted as representing tendencies to differences.


Performance in raising and 1st fattening period

The average daily gain (ADG) in 40 F was lower (P < 0.05) than 60 F at the beginning of the raising period (Table 2). The same trend, however, was observed during the 1st fattening period where ADG was significantly higher for the 60 F than the 40 F (P < 0.05).
Table 2

Feed intake and body weight gain in Hanwoo steers fed with different levels of forage in raising and 1 st fattening period



Sampling period






VI 4)


ADG1) (kg/d)



































































1)Average daily gain.

2)Dry matter intake.

3)Feed conversion ratio.

4)I-VI: Number of measurement.

a,bSignificant differences occurred at (P < 0.05).

Total dry matter intake (DMI), concentrate + forage, showed no differences between the 40 F and 60 F groups overall seen in Table 2 (P > 0.05).

The feed conversion ratio in the raising period (Table 2) tended to be higher for the 40 F than 60 F; but during the 1st fattening period there was significantly higher increase for the 60 F group than the 40 F group (P < 0.05).

Carcass characteristics and 2nd fattening period

Post-fasting weight, carcass weight and back fat thickness were not affected by treatment groups (P > 0.05).

Results of the 2nd fattening period documented above B grade in both HF and HFCM groups in quantity grade (Table 3). The quality grade (Table 3) was shown to be above 72% in the first grade and it was shown to be higher in HFCM than the LF, LFCM and HF. The rib-eye area in HF group was higher (P < 0.05) than LF and LFCM groups whereas no difference was observed between HFCM group and other treatment groups. The result of the meat yield index showed a similar trend for the result of rib-eye area among the treatment groups.
Table 3

Effect of forage level and Cr-Met chelate supplementation diets on carcass weight and meat quality obtained from native Korean beef steers (Hanwoo, Bos taurus)



LF 1)


HF 3)


Post-fasting weight (kg)

578.33 ± 40.70a

579.00 ± 41.41a

571.67 ± 19.41a

570.71 ± 48.91a

Carcass weight (kg)

343.67 ± 26.59a

344.25 ± 29.36a

345.33 ± 11.33a

339.86 ± 31.67a

Meat quantity


Back fat thickness (mm)

10.67 ± 4.80a

10.55 ± 4.58a

7.33 ± 2.07a

10.43 ± 2.87ab

 Rib-eye area (cm2)

75.67 ± 7.17b

76.15 ± 6.33b

84.67 ± 6.65a

68.10 ± 1.12ab

 Meat yield index

57.56 ± 2.26b

67.64 ± 2.08b

69.65 ± 1.24a

68.10 ± 1.12ab

 Quantity grade (A:B:C) (%)





Meat quality


 Marbling score

3.17 ± 2.64ab

2.65 ± 1.60b

4.17 ± 2.14ab

4.71 ± 2.02a

 Meat color

4.50 ± 0.55a

4.96 ± 0.22a

4.83 ± 0.75ab

4.64 ± 0.50a

 Fat color

2.67 ± 0.52b

3.00 ± 0.00a

2.83 ± 0.41ab

3.00 ± 0.00a


18.17 ± 4.40a

19.60 ± 3.42a

16.83 ± 4.58a

15.57 ± 4.22a


2.00 ± 0.00a

2.00 ± 0.00a

2.00 ± 0.00a

2.07 ± 0.27a

 Quality grade (1+:1:2:3)





1)40% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate without Cr-Met.

2)40% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate with Cr-Met.

3)60% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate without Cr-Met.

4)60% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate with Cr-Met.

abSignificant differences occurred at (P < 0.05).

Table 3 shows that the greatest marbling score belonged to the HFCM group and was significantly higher than LFCM group (P < 0.05). The fat color was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in LF group than LFCM and HFCM groups, whereas HF group didn’t show any difference in fat color among the treatment groups (P > 0.05). Meat color, texture and maturity were not affected by the treatment groups (P > 0.05).

Blood metabolites

Triglyceride, cholesterol, plasma urea nitrogen (PUN), total protein (TP), and creatinine collected in Table 4 were not affected by treatment groups (P > 0.05). The concentration of high density lipoprotein (HDL) was significantly higher for the HFCM group than LF, LFCM and HF groups (P < 0.05). Low density lipoprotein (LDL) content in LF was the highest among all treatment groups, but it showed a meaningful difference compared to HFCM group (P < 0.05). Concentration of glucose in the HFCM group was significantly higher than in the HF group (P < 0.05), but there were no other differences in glucose content between and within low forage and high forage rations. Based on Table 4 we observed the lowest content of albumin in LFCM group and it was significantly lower than LF and HF groups (P < 0.05), but no difference was perceived among LFCM and HFCM groups. The highest significant level of calcium was found in the LF group compared to others (P < 0.05) except HF group. The insulin rate in the blood was significantly higher for the HFCM group than LF, LFCM and HF groups (P < 0.05).
Table 4

Effects of forage level and Cr-Met chelate supplementation diets on blood metabolites obtained from native Korean beef steers (Hanwoo, Bos Taurus)



LF 1)


HF 3)


Triglycaride, mg/dl

29.25 ± 9.03a

24.42 ± 5.98a

31.05 ± 7.78a

22.33 ± 3.14a

Cholesterol, mg/dl

145.00 ± 15.28a

191.31 ± 18.38a

201.00 ± 4.24a

204.63 ± 17.78a

HDL-C, mg/dl

92.75 ± 7.41b

118.50 ± 22.41a

88.50 ± 7.78b

128.25 ± 17.40a

LDL-C, mg/dl

102.00 ± 15.98ab

87.17 ± 18.25ac

111.00 ± 14.14a

79.00 ± 13.18c

Glucose, mg/dl

49.50 ± 8.96ab

61.42 ± 18.46ab

41.50 ± 4.95a

65.30 ± 20.28c

BUN, mg/dl

15.20 ± 2.62a

14.92 ± 2.74a

13.95 ± 1.20a

15.33 ± 1.16a

T, Protein, g/dl

6.40 ± 0.14a

6.25 ± 0.93a

6.55 ± 0.07a

6.69 ± 0.70a

Albumin, g/dl

4.50 ± 0.24a

3.80 ± 0.65b

4.55 ± .35a

4.10 ± 0.46ab

Creatinine, mg/dl

1.38 ± 15.28a

1.30 ± 0.23a

1.50 ± 0.28a

1.39 ± 0.24a

Calcium, mg/dl

10.35 ± 0.57a

8.05 ± 1.95b

9.95 ± 0.49ab

8.43 ± 1.21b

Insulin, μU/ml

6.64 ± 1.09a

7.87 ± 2.37ab

9.04 ± 0.67ab

9.81 ± 1.57a

1)40% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate without Cr-Met.

2)40% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate with Cr-Met.

3)60% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate without Cr-Met.

4)60% forage in raising stage and 1st fattening period + concentrate with Cr-Met.

a-cSignificant differences occurred at (P < 0.05).


Performance in raising and 1st fattening period

Zinn and Plascencia [19] reported no difference among feedlot cattle fed with high (30%) and low (10%) levels of alfalfa hay supplemented with fat in their initial and final weight gain during the growing-finishing period. The final BW was similar among treatment groups and averaged 577.9 ± 6.6 kg when cows were fed with high (50% hay) and low (12% hay) forage level supplemented with wet distillers grain [12,20,21]. Moreover, according to Ohh et al. [2], the positive effect of Cr supplementation can be associated with its obvious influence on the systematic division of energy between adipose and lean tissue. Higher ADG was found at the end of 1st fattening period in steers fed with a high level of forage than steers fed with low forage levels in this experiment; however, the differences were not significant. Therefore, these results are in agreement with other studies [12,19]. Diets containing more than 8% lipid on a DM basis have been reported to decrease DMI and 8% is suggested as a maximum for beef cattle diets [22]. Boadi et al. [13] concluded that animals that were fed low forage grain diets produce more rumen methane than animals fed high forage grain diets supplemented with sunflower seeds. This fact may explain why no difference was observed in the final weight gain in both groups of high and low forage level.

Steers fed the low forage: grain diet consumed more DM than steers fed the high forage: grain diet during the 126-d feeding period [13]. Dry matter intake was similar (P = 0.78) in period I for steers assigned the low forage: grain (8.3 ± 0.6 kg) and high forage: grain (9.4 ± 0.6 kg) treatment groups; however, the rise in DMI for steers assigned the low forage: grain ration was higher in periods 2 (13.0 ± 0.6 kg) and 3 (13.8 ± 0.6 kg) than for the steers fed with high forage: grain ration in periods 2 (9.4 ± 0.5 kg) and 3 (11.0 ± 0.6 kg). In period I (raising period) of this study, the authors found the same result due to the fact that in low level of forage steers could consume more feed because their rumen has more capacity. Over time, steers tended to consume more feed of high forage level than low forage level. During the final period there was no significant overall difference in DMI between treatment groups. Fluctuation between both treatment groups in feed conversion ratio in every period during raising (I period) and 1st fattening (II) might be explained due to the same fluctuation in DMI. But the overall FCR in 60 F was higher than 40 F. Zinn and Plascencia [19], however, reported that the addition of 6% fat (DM basis) to low forage rations (10% forage) did not affect ADG, reduced DMI, and improved feed efficiency by 3.4%, whereas the addition of 6% fat (DM basis) to high forage diets (30% forage) increased ADG, lessened DMI, and enhanced feed efficiency by 17.5%. Similar results were reported by Kegley et al. [23], but Hong et al. [4] stated that 400 ppb of Cr-Met inclusion in high forage diet improved feed efficiency in Korean steers.

Carcass characteristics and 2nd fattening period

Reports of lessened fat over the 10th rib and turn down yield grades have been informed in lambs supplemented with chromium tripicolinate [24]. However, Chang et al. [25] announced that supplementing high chromium yeast for beef growing-finishing steers had no effect on carcass characteristics. Barajas et al. [26] reported that supplementation of chromium in beef steer diets has no effect on back fat thickness and rib-eye area.

More ruminal starch digestion should increase the organic acids that are later converted to glucose, which is a precursor for marbling. Boadi et al. [13] observed a marbling grade of A or better for 99% of steers however, the proportion of AA carcasses and rib-eye area were higher (P < 0.05) for the low vs. the high forage diet (75 vs. 33% and 85.9 ± 0.9 vs. 79.7 ± 0.9 cm, respectively).

Chromium supplementation has been employed to manipulate the quality of meat due to its biological function on body fat and muscle metabolism [27]. Any discussion of marbling levels must consider genetic influence. The result of organic chromium supplementation on meat quality in farm animals is varied with animal species, form of dietary chromium, and the level of chromium supplementation. However, the result has varied presumably due to other extrinsic factors such as onset and level of supplementation, nutrients and level of basal diet, breed and species [27-29]. Marbling score in HFCM was higher than LFCM while there was no difference between other treatment groups without Cr-Met supplementation, indicating that Cr-Met supplementation may affect marbling score. This significant difference may be due to the positive effect of chromium supplemented into high forage ration. The function of chromium to regulate glucose level in tissue has recently been hypothesized to produce marbled beef via phase-regulated supplementation of dietary chromium [4]. Due to the result of insulin and glucose concentration in the blood, in this study, those metabolites tended to be higher in HFCM group than LFCM group. As glucose is a precursor for marbling score, and given the role of insulin in using more glucose in tissues like meat, the higher marbling score in the HF group ration in comparison to the LF group can be explained. For this purpose, Cr-Met chelate was suggested since the chelate is generally safer than other organic chromium and could be required relatively more easily than others, due to its higher bioavailability. However, a small difference in results was reported with Korean native steer. 400 ppb of Cr-Met inclusion into high forage diet improved feed efficiency in Korean native steers during the growing period. Serum insulin concentration was the highest in chromium supplemented steers [4]. Higher fat color rate in HFCM group compared to LF group may be explained by the addition of Cr-Met in HF and LFCM groups due to the fact that steers fed with high level of forage have more beta-carotene, which can be found in high percentages in forages. Higher fat color values in Cr-Met groups may be explained by the presence of chromium in the diets. Chromium in the diets due to higher bioavailability in the form of Cr-Met chelate may cause higher feed digestion and higher fat color values in the treatment groups.

Blood metabolites

The decrease in blood cholesterol can be affected by Cr-Met because in both LFCM and HFCM groups a lower amount of cholesterol was observed, but which was not significant [6]. The HDL helps to prevent narrowing of the artery walls by removing the excess cholesterol and transporting it to the liver for excretion. The LDL carries cholesterol for cell building needs, but leaves behind any excess on artery walls and in tissues [4,6]. High LDL and low HDL levels indicate diets high in refined carbohydrates and/or carbohydrate sensitivity. Low levels of HDL are strong indicators of insulin resistance, but in our experiment we observed adverse amounts due to using Cr-Met in diets. Supplemental chromium also plays an important role in serum cholesterol homeostasis. Chromium supplementation decreased the level of the blood’s total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride but increased the level of HDL cholesterol [30]. Dietary saturated fat and cholesterol lead to elevated levels of cholesterol in the blood.

A possible mechanism of chromium on amino acid synthesis has been predicted due to the role of insulin in amino acid uptake, but other activities of chromium in protein metabolism have not been reported [31]. However, in this study, HDL cholesterol was remarkably increased whereas LDL cholesterol was decreased, resulting in a net increase of total cholesterol. In studies with rats, Kim et al. [32] showed that serum total cholesterol was decreased, whereas HDL cholesterol was increased by 300 ppb of Cr-Met addition when rats were fed a high fat diet. In relation to this result, Kim et al. [32] reported that rats fed Cr-Met chelate at 0, 300, 600, 1,200 ppb of chromium levels exerted a decrease in obesity index. These results showed a dosage-dependent decrease in body fat with increasing the dosage of Cr-Met and suggested intervention by Cr-Met in lipid metabolism. A physiological function of dietary chromium in animals and humans is proposed [7] in the view of carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, protein synthesis, growth, and longevity. Schwarz and Mertz [33] had recognized chromium as a component of GTF, which enhance not only tissue sensitivity to insulin but also glucose utilization. Therefore, glucose uptake, glucose use for lipogenesis, glucose oxidation to carbon dioxide, and glycogenesis are increased by the addition of chromium plus insulin to animal tissue [34].


Results of the raising and 1st fattening periods suggest that rumen characteristics and digestive tracts of Korean native steer were developed by the feeding of high forage-based diet during the raising period and showed a good approach for the growing steer which constantly achieved ADG during the 1st fattening period.

The results of the 2nd fattening period indicate that supplemental Cr, as Cr-Met chelate, improved the quality grade of meat and blood metabolites in the beef steer. The effectiveness of Cr-Met supplementation was higher in high-forage feeding than low-forage feeding of diets in the 2nd fattening period.



This study was supported by the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ009766)”, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea and also partially by 2013 Research Grant from Kangwon National University (No. 120131219). Authors are grateful to Austin Thelen (Department of Communication, Oregon State University, USA) for his help in editing the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University


  1. Kim CH, Park BK, Park JG, Kim HS, Sung KI, Shin JS, et al. Estimation of rumen by-pass rate of Chromium-methionine chelate by ruminal bacteria analysis. J Anim Sci Technol. 2005;47:759–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Song SY, Ghassemi Nejad J, Ohh SJ, Lee BH, Kim HS, Sung KI. Effects of chromium-methionine chelate feeding for different duration on growth and carcass characteristics of holstein steers in the late fattening stage. Ann Anim Resour Sci. 2013;24:38–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ohh SJ, Kim CH, Shin JS, Sung KI, Kim HS. Effects of different forms of Chromium supplements on serum glucose, insulin and lipids in rats. J Feed Sci Nutr. 2004;9:342–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hong SM, Sung KI, Ohh SJ, Shin JS, Kim CH, Kim HS. Effect of chromium methionine supplementation to castrated fattening steers on carcass quality and blood metabolites. Proc Ann Congress Kor Soc Anim Sci Tech. 2002;2:136.Google Scholar
  5. Ohh SJ, Lee JY. Dietary Chromium-methionine Chelate Supplementation and Animal Performance. Asian Aust J Anim Sci. 2005;6:898–907.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang MQ, Xu ZR, Zha LY, Lindemann MD. Effects of chromium nanocomposite supplementation on blood metabolites, endocrine parameters and immune traits in finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007;139:69–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mertz W. Chromium in human nutrition: a review. J Nutr. 1993;123:623–33.Google Scholar
  8. Mordenti A, Piva A, Piva G. The European perspective on organic chromium in animal nutrition. In: Lyons TP, Jacques KA, editors. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry: Proceedings of Alltech’s 13th Annual Symposium. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press; 1997. p. 227–40.Google Scholar
  9. NRC. The Role of Chromium in Animal Nutrition. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. USA Nutr. 1997;32:706–9.Google Scholar
  10. Hayirli A, Bremmer DR, Bertics SJ, Socha MT, Grummer RR. Effect of chromium supplementation on production and metabolic parameters in periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:1218–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McNamara JP, Valdez F. Adipose tissue metabolism and production responses to calcium propionate and chromium propionate. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:2498–507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schoonmaker JP, Trenkle AH, Beitz DC. Effect of feeding wet distillers grains on performance, marbling deposition, and fatty acid content of beef from steers fed low or high forage diets. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3657–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Boadi DA, Wittenberg KM, Scott SL, Burton D, Buckley K, Small JA, et al. Effect of low and high forage diet on enteric and manure pack greenhouse gas emissions from a feedlot. Can J Anim Sci. 2004;84:445–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. AOAC. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1990.Google Scholar
  15. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Washington, DC: Agric. Handbook. No.379. ARS, USDA; 1991.Google Scholar
  16. MIFAFF. “Grading Standard for Livestock Producs” (published in Korean; translated into English). Republic of Korea: Notification No. 2007–40 of the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; 2007.Google Scholar
  17. SAS. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (Version 8.01 Edition). Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc; 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1980. ISBN 0-81381560-6.Google Scholar
  19. Zinn RA, Plascencia A. Effects of forage level on the comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in growing-finishing diets for feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:1194–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Mello AS, Calkins CR, Jenschke BE, Senaratne LS, Erickson GE. Effects of wet distillers grains plus soluble on marbling attributes and fat content of beef. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(E-Suppl 3):39.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrell C, Shackelford S, Varel V. Effects of distillers grains on feedlot performance of crossbred steers. J Anim Sci. 2009;86(E-Suppl 2):583.Google Scholar
  22. Zinn RA. Effects of excessive supplemental fat on feedlot cattle growth performance and digestive function. Prof Anim Sci. 1994;10:66–72.Google Scholar
  23. Kegley EB, Galloway DL, Fakler TM. Effects of dietary chromium-L methionine on glucose metabolism of beef steers. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:3177–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitchalong L, Fernandez JM, Bunting LD, Southern LL, Bidner TD. Influence of chromium tripicolinate on glucose metabolism and nutrient partitioning in growing lambs. J Anim Sci. 1995;73:2694–705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chang X, Mowat DN, Spiers GA. Carcass characteristics and tissue-mineral contents of steers fed supplemental chromium. Can J Anim Sci. 1992;72:663–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Barajas R, Cervantes BJ, Velazquez EA, Romo JA, Juarez F, Rojas PJ. Chromium methionine supplementation on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of bulls: I. results during cool season in the northwest of Mexico. Western Section, American Soci of Anim Sci Proceedings. 2008;59:374–7.Google Scholar
  27. Page TG, Southern LL, Ward TL, Thompson Jr DL. Effect of chromium picolinate on growth and serum and carcass traits of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 1993;71:656–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ward TL, Southern LL, Anderson RA. Effect of dieatry chromium source on growth, carcass characteristics, and plasma metabolite and hormone concentrations in growing-finishing swine. J Anim Sci. 1995;73 Suppl 1:189.Google Scholar
  29. Crow SD. Effect of chromium addition along with varying protein levels on growth performances and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing pigs. USA: Research Investment Report. National Pork Producers Council; 1997.Google Scholar
  30. Anderson RA. Chromium, glucose tolerance, and lipid metabolism. J Adv Med. 1995;8:37.Google Scholar
  31. Roginski EE, Mertz W. Effect of chromium (III) supplementation on glucose and amino acid metabolism in rats fed a low protein diet. J Nutr. 1969;97:525–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim HS, Lee SY, Kim CH, Ohh SJ, Shin JS, Sung KI. Effect of chromium methionine supplementation on obesity index and serum lipids in rats. J Food Sci Nutr. 2003;32:700–6.Google Scholar
  33. Schwarz K, Mertz W. Chromium (III) and the glucose tolerance factor. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959;85:292–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Anderson RA. in trace elements in human and animal nutrition, Vol. 1, 5th (Ed. W. Mertz). New York: Academic Press Inc; 1987. p. 225–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Sung et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.