Open Access

A comparison of supplemental calcium soap of palm fatty acids versus tallow in a corn-based finishing diet for feedlot steers

  • Crystal M. Warner1,
  • Sahng-Wook Hahm1,
  • Shawn L. Archibeque1,
  • John J. Wagner1,
  • Terry E. Engle1,
  • Ivette N. Roman-Muniz1,
  • Dale Woerner1,
  • Mark Sponsler2 and
  • Hyungchul Han1Email author
Journal of Animal Science and Technology201557:25

DOI: 10.1186/s40781-015-0053-5

Received: 17 February 2015

Accepted: 13 May 2015

Published: 15 June 2015

Abstract

Rumen bypass fat is commonly added to increase energy intake in dairy cattle. The objective of this study is to examine the addition of rumen bypass fat during finishing period on performance and carcass characteristics in grain fed steers. This study was conducted as a completely randomized block design with 126 cross-bred steer calves (initial BW 471.5 ± 7.5 kg) randomly assigned to pens with 9 steers/pen (n = 7 pens/treatment). Each pen was randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups; rumen bypass fat treatment (CCS, calcium soap of palm fatty acids) and control diet (CT, tallow). The diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and isocaloric. Animals were fed twice daily at 110 % of the previous daily ad libitum intake. Blood from each sample was taken from the jugular vein. Muscle and adipose samples were collected from the longissimus dorsi regions. Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics were assessed. To examine adipogenic gene expression, quantitative real-time PCR was completed. Steers fed the CT had a greater level of performance for most of the parameters measured. The CT group had greater DMI (P < 0.05) and tended to have greater ADG (P < 0.10). Marbling score (P < 0.05) and quality grade (P < 0.05) were greater for steers fed the CT diet than those fed CCS. The longissimus muscle area tended to be greater (P < 0.10) in steers fed CT (87.60 cm2) than those fed CCS (84.88 cm2). The leptin mRNA expression was down-regulated (P < 0.05) in adipose tissue of steers fed a CCS when compared to those fed CT. These data suggest that calcium soap of palm fatty acids can be added to finishing diets without significant reduction in final body weight, although there may be modest reductions in marbling and quality scores.

Keywords

Beef Fatty acids Rumen bypass fat

Background

Currently in the beef industry, the majority are fed high concentrate diets, which is ideal for rapid intramuscular adipose deposition, a characteristic desired for better meat quality [1]. Ruminant fat is an important energy source consisting of predominantly saturated fatty acids (SFA), palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0), and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) [2]. Naturally occurring trans fatty acids found in animal products are conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) and vaccenic acid (18:1, trans-11) [3]. They are produced from PUFA via ruminal biohydrogenation and are known to be beneficial to human health [4]. Ruminant fat has a lower PUFA: SFA ratio than non-ruminant fat [5]. Saturated fatty acids may have negative health implications, such as increased serum low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration and increase risk of coronary heart disease in human [6]. Thus, nutritional strategies that increase of PUFA levels in beef cattle are required to meet the demands of beef consumer. There has been interest over the past years to increase unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) levels in beef. With aims to decrease the SFA concentration of beef intramuscular adipose tissues, research is being conducted in order to minimize the SFA concentration and increase the UFA concentration in ruminant products while maintaining typical, cost efficient, grain-based feedlot finishing diets. One experimental method includes the supplementation of rumen-protected fats. They are insoluble lipids that bypass the rumen and are utilized as an energy source upon absorption in the small intestine. Fat supplementation was originally used to meet the high energy requirements of high producing dairy cattle [7]. Unsaturated fatty acids are also more readily digestible than SFA; therefore increased UFA absorption may improve production efficiency. An increase in milk yield has also been reported by previous study in cows supplemented with 4 % bypass fat [8]. The increased milk yield with supplemental bypass fat may be ascribed to an enhancement in energy balance. Corn based diet with protected fat also showed higher digestibility of ether extracts than corn based diet in beef cattle [9]. Moreover, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids have been correlated to improved reproductive efficiency and carcass characteristics of ruminant animals [10, 11]. According to previous studies, UFA has been found in higher concentration in intramuscular fat of grass-fed beef cattle than in grain-fed [5, 12]. Alternatively, research indicates that grain-fed beef has a greater SFA concentration [13] and a lesser PUFA: SFA ratio than grass-fed beef [14]. Therefore, calcium soap of palm fatty acids supplementation may be an alternative feeding strategy when fresh pasture is not available.

By the inclusion of calcium soap of palm oil fatty acids, UFA are protected from the harsh environment of the rumen allowing them to escape microbial fermentation and biohydrogenation, therefore entering the small intestine as unsaturated and being more efficiently utilized by the ruminant [8]. Through extrapolation of bypass fats efficiency in dairy cattle, it is hypothesized that calcium soap of palm fatty acids supplementation high in UFA during finishing period will increase the circulating UFA in blood and consequently deposition into intramuscular meat in steers fed high corn-based finishing rations. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of feeding calcium soap of palm fatty acids on meat fatty acid composition in grain fed beef steers during finishing period.

Methods

Animal care and procedure

A total of 126 cross-bred steer calves (initial BW 471.5 ± 7.5 kg) were housed at Southeastern Colorado Research Center (SECRC, Lamar, CO, USA). The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approved the care and use of animals for Colorado State University for this trial. Steers arrived at SECRC 60 days prior to trial commencement and offered ad libitum access to alfalfa hay for back grounding. Steers were processed for ear tags, initial body weight and rectal temperatures were recorded. Steers were ranked by body weight and housed 9 steers/pen (n = 7 pens/treatment). Following the 60 day adaptation period, each pen was randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups; rumen bypass fat (CCS, corn based finishing ration with Megalac R) or control diet (CT, corn based finishing ration with tallow) (Table 1). The CCS diet was formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous. The calcium soap of palm fatty acids (Megalac-R, Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, NJ, USA) was included in the CCS diet at the expense of primarily tallow. Rumen bypass fat supplement was mixed with total mixed ration (TMR) at 4.305 % DM. Prior to feeding, Rumen bypass fat was added to the feed processor. Treatments were randomly assigned to pens such that 63 animals (7 pens with 9 head/pen) received same diet. Treatment lasted a total of 60 days. Animals were fed twice daily (approximately 7 am and 5 pm) at an estimated 110 % of the previous daily ad libitum intake. Feed bunks were cleaned and orts collected on a weekly basis before morning feeding. Dry matter content was analyzed. Diet sample was collected weekly following morning feeding and analyzed for proximate analysis. Body weight of steers was recorded on d 0, 30 and 60 (d 0 is dietary treatment commencement).
Table 1

Experimental diet on DM basis

 

Treatment

Ingredient Basis: % of DM

CT

CCS1

Corn Silage 50 % Gr

9.78

9.78

Corn Grain Flaked

75.56

76.62

Distillers Gr. + Soluble

4.56

4.23

Corn Steep

3.00

3.00

Urea

1.22

1.22

Tallow

3.79

-

Limestone

1.47

0.23

Potassium Chloride

0.19

0.21

Salt

0.25

0.25

Trace mineral

0.11

0.16

Megalac-R

 

4.30

Analyzed Nutrients

  

Dry matter, % of as-fed

71.83

71.83

Crude protein

13.40

13.40

Non-protein nitrogen

3.41

3.41

Neutral detergent fiber

12.23

12.23

Forage NDF2,3

4.00

4.00

NEm3, Mcal/cwt DM

98.07

98.07

NEg3, Mcal/cwt DM

66.87

66.87

Ether extract

7.03

7.03

Calcium

0.74

0.74

Phosphorus

0.35

0.35

Potassium

0.70

0.70

Magnesium

0.20

0.20

Sulfur

0.20

0.20

Vitamin A3, IU/cwt DM

1000

1000

Vitamin E3, IU/cwt DM

15

15

Monensin3, g/ton DM

30

30

Tylosin3, g/ton DM

10

10

1 Diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous

2Neutral detergent fiber from the forage components of the diet

3Theoretical values

Blood collection

Blood samples were collected on d 0, 30 and 60. Approximately 12 mL of blood was taken from the jugular vein using 20 gauge, 1½ inch vacutainer needles at each collection for fatty acid analysis. Serum from each sample was collected and stored in −80 °C for fat determination. Steers were transported and harvested at commercial slaughterhouse (JBS Swift Slaughterhouse, Greeley, CO, USA) on d 62 and were slaughtered according to industry-accepted procedures.

Animal harvest and carcass evaluation

Upon slaughter, carcasses were weighed to obtain hot carcass weight (HCW). Muscle and adipose tissue samples were dissected from the longissimus dorsi region, flash frozen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent pulverization and fatty acid determination. Following the carcass-chilling period, carcass quality characteristics were assessed according to USDA standard techniques by trained Colorado State University personnel; marbling, quality grade, fat thickness, longissimus muscle (LM) area, KPH (kidney, pelvic, and heart fat), preliminary yield grade, final yield grade, and dressing percent.

Fatty acid composition analysis

Three steers were randomly selected from each experimental unit (pen). The longissimus dorsi region tissue were pulverized using a Waring blender. Blood serum samples were pooled for each experimental unit. Total lipid from blood serum and intramuscular adipose was extracted using the procedure outlined by Folch et al. [15] followed by methylation as described by Morrison et al. [16]. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were determined by gas chromatography (Hewlett-Packard, 6890 series II, CA, USA) equipped with a SP-2560 fused silica capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d.; Supelco Inc., PA, USA), with a series 7683 injector and flame ionization detector. Helium was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 2.1 mL/min. Fatty acids were identified by comparing the retention times displayed on the chromatographs to that of reference standards.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA from frozen adipose tissues was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, NY, USA). Isolated RNA was further purified by using RNeasy Mini Kit (Quiagen, CA, USA) with RNase-free DNase (Quiagen, CA, USA) and quantified by use of a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, DE, USA). Synthesis of cDNA was performed using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Real-time PCR was performed for the targets leptin, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), fatty acid synthase (FASN) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase (delta-9-desaturase, SCD) mRNA and housekeeping glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA (Table 2). Real-time PCR was conducted using the LightCycler480 PCR system (Roche Applied Sciences, IN, USA) with 384-well plates. The PCR cycle conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 sec, 61 °C for 30 sec, and 72 °C 15 sec followed by a melt curve analysis to confirm amplification of single cDNA products. The Ct values were obtained from the Lightcycler software (Roche Applied Sciences, IN, USA) and adjusted for GAPDH Ct values for each sample to determine Ct and relative expression of the target mRNA. Data were presented as 2-Ct [17].
Table 2

Real-time PCR primer sequences

Target gene

Primer sequence

Accession #

GAPDH

F: GATTGTCAGCAATGCCTCCT

NM_001034034.2

R: GGTCATAAGTCCCTCCACGA

Leptin

F: TGTGGCTTTGGCCCTATCTG

NM_173928.2

R: CGGACTGCGTGTGTGAGATG

Lipoprotein lipase

F: ATACACCAACCAGGCCTTCG

NM_001075120.1

R: GCTTTGCCAAGTTTCAGCCA

Fatty acid synthase

F: CTGCCGAAGACAGGGATTGT

NM_001012669.1

R: TGTACAGCTTCTGCTGGTGG

Stearoyl-CoA desaturase

F: CCTGTGGAGTCACCGAACC

NM_173959.4

R: CAAAAACGTCATTCTGGAACGC

Statistical analysis

This study was conducted as a completely randomized block design with repeated measures, consisting of two treatment groups with 63 animals per treatment, divided into 7 pens. In order to minimize the effect of initial body weight, steers were assigned into 1–7 weight blocks based off of body weight at d 0. Rumen bypass fat treatment was randomly assigned into 7 pens, while the other 7 were fed the CT diet. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed on feedlot performance, fatty acid composition and carcass data were analyzed on a pen mean basis using PROC GLM of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute, Inc., NC, USA). The model includes treatment as fixed effect and pen as random effect for USDA quality and yield grades, incidence of morbidity and mortality and fatty acid profile analysis. The treatment difference was detected using a modified students test. Responses are reported using LS means ± standard error. Significance was determined at P < 0.05 and tendency at P < 0.10.

Results and discussion

Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics are presented in Table 3. Steers fed the CT diet had greater DMI (10.14 kg vs. 8.77 kg; P < 0.02) than those fed CCS diet. Average daily gain tended to be greater in CT steers when compared to CCS fed steers (1.64 kg vs. 1.25 kg; P < 0.07). The smell and taste of calcium soap of palm fatty acids may influenced the palatability of the whole diet with decreased total DMI. The ADG was not increased because of depressed DMI. These results are in agreement with previous research [9] in which decreases in ADG was observed in cattle fed corn based diet with rumen protected fat. It has been also reported that steers fed rumen-bypass PUFA source (Megalac R) had decreased mean DMI and tended to have reduced ADG [18]. Although DMI decreased in CCS steers, the final body weight and gain:feed ratio were not significantly different between CT and CCS steers.
Table 3

Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of steers fed CT (tallow) or CCS (calcium soap of palm fatty acids) diet

 

Treatment

Parameter

CT

CCS1

SE

P <

Initial BW, kg

471.8

471.4

7.5

0.29

Final BW, kg

570.1

546.6

8.1

0.15

ADG2, kg

1.640

1.253

0.07

0.07

DMI3, kg

10.140

8.772

0.36

0.02

Gain: Feed

0.162

0.143

0.01

0.14

HCW4, kg

360.47

345.8

7.44

0.19

Marbling score5

402.9

374.1

8.89

0.04

Quality grade6

384.2

362.7

5.50

0.02

Dressing, %

60.67

60.63

0.24

0.90

Adjusted fat thickness, cm

1.035

0.997

0.08

0.73

LM area, cm5

87.60

84.88

1.10

0.10

Yield grade

3.019

2.982

0.08

0.74

1Diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous

2ADG, average daily gain

3DMI, dry matter intake

4HCW, hot carcass weight

5Practically Devoid = 100; Traces = 200; Slight = 300; Small = 400; Modest = 500; Moderate = 600; Slightly Abundant = 700; Moderately Abundant = 800; Abundant = 900

6Standard = 200; Select = 300; Choice = 400; Prime = 500

Hot carcass weight was not significantly different between treatments (P < 0.19). Marbling score (P < 0.05) and quality grade (P < 0.05) were greater for steers fed the CT diet than those fed CCS. The longissimus dorsi area tended to be greater (P < 0.10) in steers fed CT (87.60 cm2) than those fed CCS (84.88 cm2). The effects of rumen bypass fat on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics were in favor of the CT diet group. Decreased feed intake and BW gain coincides with the tendency (P = 0.10) for a lesser longissimus dorsi area in the CCS group compared to CT group. Marbling score and quality grade were greater for the CT than CCS. This may be attributed to increased intramuscular fatty acid deposition in steers fed the CT diet as a result of greater feed intake and subsequently greater weight gain. Carcass characteristics were statistically analyzed as categorical data assuming binomial distribution; quality grade for all steer were either select or choice and either had slight or small marbling scores. However, no treatment effects were detected for carcass evaluation.

Numerically, there was an increase in UFA in CCS group in blood and muscle, although it is not statistically significant (Tables 4 and 5). No significant effects of CCS group on fatty acids composition in longissimus dorsi muscle tissue were found (Table 4). The linoleic acid (C18:2 t) in blood was tended to be greater in CCS group when compared to CT group (Table 5). Day intervals in Table 5 were not expressed for fatty acids where there was no treatment by time interactions. However, significant treatment by time interactions were observed between treatment groups for palmitoleic acid (C16:1) and oleic acid (C18:1 c9) in fatty acid composition of serum. At day 60, the CCS diet had a significant decrease in palmitoleic acid. Alternatively, at day 60, the CCS diet was significantly increased in oleic acid than was the CT diet. This tradeoff may be explained by the high C18:1 concentration in the CCS treatment diet. Due to the treatment by time interaction seen in the blood serum at day 60, a longer feeding period may be necessary for increased effects of rumen protected fat on the fatty acid composition of blood serum, which may result in alteration of muscle fatty acid composition. As fatty acids enter the circulatory systems, free fatty acids are transported in the blood bound to albumin while other lipids are transported packaged as lipoproteins and delivered to tissues [19]. Continued increase in circulating fatty acids and thus increased delivery to tissues, will potentially produce a greater content of these fatty acids in the muscle tissue. Moreover, higher proportion of CLA was observed in CCS groups. CLA are isomers of linoleic acid (18:2) with conjugated double bonds, most notably cis-9, trans-11-octadecadienoic acid (c9, t11-18:2) [20]. Research has indicated that CLA have anticarcinogenic effects [21, 22], enhance immune response [23], reduce LDL plasma cholesterol levels, and suppress cholesterol-induced atherosclerosis [24, 25]. Although the results of fatty acids composition from the present study do not reflect the effects on human health, we could expect that the quality of fatty acids composition in adipose tissues of beef cattle would be improved by the manipulation of UFA composition through the supplementation of calcium soap of palm fatty acids.
Table 4

Effects of CT (tallow) or CCS (calcium soap of palm fatty acids) diet on fatty acid composition of beef longissimus dorsi muscle (% of total fatty acids reported)

 

Treatment

  

Fatty acid

CT

CCS1

SE

P <

C14:0

3.67

3.44

0.15

0.29

C14:1

0.27

0.26

0.03

0.82

C15:0

0.64

0.59

0.05

0.74

C16:0

25.30

25.45

0.53

0.42

C16:1 c9

1.11

0.85

0.36

0.41

C17:0

1.60

1.46

0.17

0.67

C18:0

20.07

19.49

1.02

0.45

C18:1 c11-15

6.37

6.06

0.42

0.65

C18:1 c9

34.68

36.14

0.65

0.76

C18:1 t (total)

3.71

3.53

0.21

0.84

C18:2 Total

1.77

1.76

0.10

0.44

C18:2 t2

0.59

0.68

0.07

0.29

C18:3 n-3

0.22

0.24

0.01

0.74

C20:1 c11

0.18

0.14

0.02

0.38

C22:5 n-3

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.87

Saturated

51.09

50.30

0.18

0.86

Unsaturated

48.91

49.70

0.19

0.84

MUFA

46.31

47.00

0.12

0.68

PUFA

2.60

2.70

0.08

0.21

Sat.: Unsat.3

1.04

1.01

0.02

0.41

1Diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous

2Includes C18:2 c9 t11, C18:2 t10 c12, C18:2 c11 t13, and C18:2 tt

3Total saturated fatty acid to total unsaturated fatty acid ratio

Table 5

Effects of CT (tallow) or CCS (calcium soap of palm fatty acids) diet on fatty acid composition of serum (% of total fatty acids reported)

 

Treatment

 

P <

Fatty acid

CT

CCS1

SE

Trt

Time

Trt x Time

C14:0

0.92

0.91

0.09

0.62

0.29

0.76

C14:1

0.63

0.65

0.08

0.95

0.18

0.83

C15:0

1.18

1.20

0.05

0.58

0.14

0.93

C16:0

21.70

20.30

0.82

0.24

0.27

0.85

C16:12

2.58

2.35

0.12

0.21

0.21

0.02

 0d

2.39

3.06

0.20

0.18

-

-

 30d

2.68

2.02

0.13

0.07

-

-

 60d

2.65

1.94

0.07

0.03

-

-

C17:0

2.48

2.37

0.13

0.57

0.00

0.68

C17:1

0.86

0.72

0.06

0.09

0.04

0.87

C18:0

14.19

14.12

0.73

0.96

0.84

0.87

C18:1 c92

5.92

6.77

0.65

0.37

0.00

0.04

 0d

4.50

4.08

0.72

0.20

-

-

 30d

5.62

7.61

0.61

0.05

-

-

 60d

4.70

8.02

0.44

0.01

-

-

C18:1 t (total)3

2.48

2.54

0.15

0.87

0.08

0.89

C18:2 t (total)4

3.37

3.39

0.04

0.06

0.88

0.71

C18:2

38.67

39.39

1.37

0.32

0.06

0.94

C18:3 n-3

1.17

1.09

0.13

0.78

0.01

0.95

C20:1 c11

2.98

2.72

0.48

0.60

0.18

0.68

C22:5 n-3

1.85

1.69

0.32

0.61

0.01

0.79

Saturated

40.47

38.90

1.09

0.29

0.25

0.76

Unsaturated

59.52

61.10

1.21

0.21

0.12

0.68

MUFA

14.46

15.54

0.75

0.68

0.02

0.29

PUFA

45.06

45.56

1.41

0.58

0.14

0.96

Sat.: Unsat.5

0.68

0.62

0.021

0.23

0.03

0.54

1Diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous

2Trt × time interaction (P < 0.05). Fatty acids were indicated by each day of blood samples collection

3Includes C18:1 t-10 and t-11

4Includes C18:2 c9,t-11; t-10, c-12; c-9, c-11; t-9, t-11

5Total saturated fatty acid to total unsaturated fatty acid ratio

The low rumen pH caused by high concentrate diets typically fed to feedlot cattle may contribute to minimal changes of fatty acid profile. Due to the differences in feed formulation of dairy versus feedlot cattle, bypass fat function differs at the opposing rumen pH. High forage concentrations of dairy cattle yield an increased pH, while the higher concentrate diets of feedlot cattle decreases rumen pH. Rumen bypass fats are more stable and work optimally at a normal rumen pH of 5.5–6.5 [26]. It has been reported that ruminal fluid pH was 5.8 in cattle fed corn based diet with protected fat for 41 days [9]. As pH decreases in the rumen, calcium soaps more readily dissociate leaving the free fatty acids susceptible to biohydrogenation into their saturated form for subsequent absorption. Therefore by increasing rumen pH more fatty acids may stay intact with the calcium ion, escaping biohydrogenation and dissociate in the abomasum and duodenum for subsequent digestion. Future studies under optimized ruminal pH conditions are needed to better understand the rumen bypass fat and UFA production mechanism in grain finishing beef cattle.

To obtain a clear understanding for the carcass characteristics results, the mRNA expression of genes involved in lipogenesis was examined in adipose tissue. The down-regulation of leptin mRNA was observed in steers fed a CCS diet when compared to those fed CT diet (P < 0.05) (Table 6). The SCD mRNA expression tended (P = 0.07) to be less in steers fed a CCS diet when compared to those fed CT diet. There were no significant differences between the treatments in LPL (P = 0.92) and FASN (P = 0.32) mRNA expression. Leptin, a protein hormones synthesized and secreted by adipocytes in white adipose tissue, may be an indicator of marbling, back fat depth, and quality grade of feedlot cattle [27]. Moreover, bovine leptin gene is related to marbling [28]. In this study, mRNA expression of leptin in adipose tissue was reduced by calcium soap of palm fatty acids supplementation. This is reasonable in that steers fed the CT diet had increased carcass weight and marbling scores. Greater marbling score may induced greater leptin production in steers fed a CT diet. This supposition is reinforced by the positive correlations existing between marbling score and serum leptin in cattle as reported by Geary et al. [29]. Reduced leptin expression in adipose tissue would decrease circulating concentration of leptin, therefore, it seems reasonable that marbling score could also decrease.
Table 6

Altered mRNA expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism of steers adipose tissue

Gene

CT1

CCS2

P <

Leptin

1.17 ± 0.08

0.82 ± 0.13

0.04

LPL

1.75 ± 0.24

1.69 ± 0.55

0.92

FASN

2.12 ± 0.75

1.19 ± 0.49

0.32

SCD

1.17 ± 0.12

0.68 ± 0.21

0.07

The data are expressed as the means ± S.E

Lipoprotein lipase, LPL; Fatty acid synthase, FASN; Stearoyl-CoA desaturase, SCD

1CT, corn based diet-tallow

2CCS, corn based diet-calcium soap of palm oil fatty acids

Other genes related to lipogenesis, including LPL, FASN and SCD were observed. LPL hydrolyzes triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to make NEFA for uptake in peripheral tissues [30]. FASN regulates lipid biosynthesis from NADPH and acetyl-CoA in adipose tissue [31]. LPL and FASN are important enzymes in adipocyte lipogenesis and have been found to have greater mRNA expression in the subcutaneous fat than in the intramuscular fat tissue [32]. This may explain the similar levels of LPL and FASN expression observed from the tissue between treatments groups. While marbling score of carcass did statistically differ between groups, similar fat thickness was observed in the present study. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 is an enzyme involved in the catalyzing the desaturation of saturated fatty acids to monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) [33]. It has previously been reported that increasing n-3 PUFA composition in the diet caused a significant reduction in SCD expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue of Holstein bulls [34]. It may be explained by the correlation with reduced gene expression levels of lipogenic transcription factor (sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c, SREBP1c) in adipose tissue. These results are in agreement with the findings of the current study as CCS supplementation showed decrease in SCD mRNA expression as compared to steers fed CT diet. Moreover, alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) inhibited SCD gene expression in the adipocytes of mice [35]. However, MUFA composition of longissimus dorsi muscle was not affected by CCS supplementation. In some studies, there was no correlation between Δ9-desaturase index and SCD gene expression in subcutaneous fat [36], and the Δ9-desaturase index does not correctly reflect the enzyme activity in cattle [37]. Similarly, Wynn et al. [38] observed no effect of Megalac supplementation on SCD mRNA expression level in sheep. Further study is needed to clarify whether there is difference in SCD expression depends on supplementation methods and periods.

Conclusions

In conclusion, these data suggest that calcium soap of palm fatty acids can be added to finishing diets without significant reduction in final body weight, although there may be modest reductions in marbling and quality scores. Few significant differences were seen in the muscle and serum fatty acid composition. Adjustment of finishing diet formulation in favor of a more basic pH may increase PUFA in intramuscular adipose, although this may result in decreased ADG and therefore a longer time requirement to reach slaughter weight. Potential future research to consider for a significantly increase UFA content include feeding rumen bypass fat for an extended time period as opposed to the 60 days fed in this trial.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by Colorado Corn Growers Association.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University
(2)
Colorado Corn Growers Association

References

  1. Vernon RG. Lipid metabolism in the adipose tissue of ruminant animals. Prog Lipid Res. 1980;19(1–2):23–106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Cordain L, Watkins BA, Florant GL, Kelher M, Rogers L, Li Y. Fatty acid analysis of wild ruminant tissues: evolutionary implications for reducing diet-related chronic disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(3):181–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hodgson JM, Wahlqvist ML, Boxall JA, Balazs ND. Platelet trans fatty acids in relation to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 1996;120(1–2):147–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kepler CR, Hirons KP, McNeill JJ, Tove SB. Intermediates and products of the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrinvibrio fibrisolvens. J Biol Chem. 1966;241(6):1350–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. French P, Stanton C, Lawless F, O’Riordan EG, Monahan FJ, Caffrey PJ, et al. Fatty acid composition, including conjugated linoleic acid, of intramuscular fat from steers offered grazed grass, grass silage, or concentrate-based diets. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(11):2849–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss RM. Saturated fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease: modulation by replacement nutrients. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2010;12(6):384–90.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Palmquist DL. Influence of source and amount of dietary fat on digestibility in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(4):1354–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Purushothaman S, Kumar A, Tiwari DP. Effect of feeding calcium salts of palm oil fatty acids on performance of lactating crossbred cows. Asian Aust J Anim Sci. 2008;21(3):376–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill GM, West JW. Rumen protected fat in kline barley or corn diets for beef cattle: digestibility, physiological, and feedlot responses. J Anim Sci. 1991;69(8):3376–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mattos R, Staples CR, Thatcher WW. Effects of dietary fatty acids on reproduction in ruminants. Rev Reprod. 2000;5(1):38–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ponnampalam EN, Sinclairt AJ, Egan AR, Blakeley SJ, Leury BJ. Effect of diets containing n-3 fatty acids on muscle long-chain n-3 fatty acid content in lambs fed low- and medium-quality roughage diets. J Anim Sci. 2001;79(3):698–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dannenberger D, Nuernberg K, Nuernberg G, Scollan N, Steinhart H, Ender K. Effect of pasture vs. concentrate diet on CLA isomer distribution in different tissue lipids of beef cattle. Lipids. 2005;40(6):589–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Realini CE, Duckett SK, Hill NS, Hoveland CS, Lyon BG, Sackmann JR, et al. Effect of endophyte type on carcass traits, meat quality, and fatty acid composition of beef cattle grazing tall fescue. J Anim Sci. 2005;83(2):430–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Duckett SK, Wagner DG, Yates LD, Dolezal HG, May SG. Effects of time on feed on beef nutrient composition. J Anim Sci. 1993;71(8):2079–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226(1):497–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Morrison WR, Smith LM. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethylacetals from lipids with boron fluoride–methanol. J Lipid Res. 1964;5:600–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Araujo DB, Cooke RF, Hansen GR, Staples CR, Arthington JD. Effects of rumen-protected polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on performance and physiological responses of growing cattle after transportation and feedlot entry. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(12):4120–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Spector AA. Fatty acid binding to plasma albumin. J Lipid Res. 1975;16(3):165–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ha YL, Storkson J, Pariza MW. Inhibition of benzo(a)pyrene-induced mouse forestomach neoplasia by conjugated dienoic derivatives of linoleic acid. Cancer Res. 1990;50(4):1097–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ip C, Singh M, Thompson HJ, Scimeca JA. Conjugated linoleic acid suppresses mammary carcinogenesis and proliferative activity of the mammary gland in the rat. Cancer Res. 1994;54(5):1212–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Parodi PW. Conjugated linoleic acid and other anticarcinogenic agents of bovine milk fat. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82(6):1339–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nugent AP, Roche HM, Noone EJ, Long A, Kelleher DK, Gibney MJ. The effects of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on immune function in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(6):742–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Moloney F, Yeow TP, Mullen A, Nolan JJ, Roche HM. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation, insulin sensitivity, and lipoprotein metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(4):887–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolosi RJ, Laitinen L. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid reduces aortic fatty streak formation greater than linoleic acid in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Faseb J. 1996;10(3):2751–1.Google Scholar
  26. Sukhija PS, Palmquist DL. Dissociation of calcium soaps of long-chain fatty acids in rumen fluid. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73(7):1784–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. McFadin EL, Keisler DH, Schmidt TB, Lorenzen CL, Berg EP. Correlations between serum concentrations of leptin and beef carcass composition and quality. J Muscle Foods. 2003;14(1):81–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nkrumah JD, Li C, Yu J, Hansen C, Keisler DH, Moore SS. Polymorphisms in the bovine leptin promoter associated with serum leptin concentration, growth, feed intake, feeding behavior, and measures of carcass merit. J Anim Sci. 2005;83(1):20–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Geary TW, McFadin EL, MacNeil MD, Grings EE, Short RE, Funston RN, et al. Leptin as a predictor of carcass composition in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2003;81(1):1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Merkel M, Eckel RH, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase: genetics, lipid uptake, and regulation. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(12):1997–2006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ranganathan G, Unal R, Pokrovskaya I, Yao-Borengasser A, Phanavanh B, Lecka-Czernik B, et al. The lipogenic enzymes DGAT1, FAS, and LPL in adipose tissue: effects of obesity, insulin resistance, and TZD treatment. J Lipid Res. 2006;47(11):2444–50.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Pickworth CL, Loerch SC, Velleman SG, Pate JL, Poole DH, Fluharty FL. Adipogenic differentiation state-specific gene expression as related to bovine carcass adiposity. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(2):355–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Li X, Ekerljung M, Lundstrom K, Lunden A. Association of polymorphisms at DGAT1, leptin, SCD1, CAPN1 and CAST genes with color, marbling and water holding capacity in meat from beef cattle populations in Sweden. Meat Sci. 2013;94(2):153–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hiller B, Herdmann A, Nuernberg K. Dietary n-3 fatty acids significantly suppress lipogenesis in bovine muscle and adipose tissue: A functional genomics approach. Lipids. 2011;46:557–67.Google Scholar
  35. Sessler AM, Kaur N, Palta JP, Ntambi JM. Regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 mRNA stability by polyunsaturated fatty acids in 3 T3-L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(47):29854–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Corazzin M, Bovolenta S, Sepulcri A, Piasentier E. Effect of whole linseed addition on meat production and quality of Italian Simmental and Holstein young bulls. Meat Sci. 2012;90(1):99–105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Archibeque SL, Lunt DK, Gilbert CD, Tume RK, Smith SB. Fatty acid indices of stearoyl-CoA desaturase do not reflect actual stearoyl-CoA desaturase enzyme activities in adipose tissues of beef steers finished with corn-, flaxseed-, or sorghum-based diets. J Anim Sci. 2005;83(5):1153–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wynn RJ, Daniel ZC, Flux CL, Craigon J, Salter AM, Buttery PJ. Effect of feeding rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid on carcass characteristics and fatty acid composition of sheep tissues. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(12):3440–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Warner et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement