Open Access

Effect of mixed hay supplementation during fattening on carcass traits and meat quality of Hanwoo steers

  • Dicky Tri Utama1,
  • Ji Hye Choi1,
  • Chang Woo Lee2,
  • Yeon Soo Park2 and
  • Sung Ki Lee1, 3Email author
Journal of Animal Science and Technology201759:6

DOI: 10.1186/s40781-017-0131-y

Received: 23 October 2016

Accepted: 13 February 2017

Published: 13 March 2017

Abstract

Background

This study was aim to observe the effects of feeding mixed local hay (MH) consisted of 55% orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.), 35% tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and 10% red clover (Trifolium pratense) to Hanwoo steers on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality (longissimus thoracis) compared with feeding imported timothy hay (TH) and local rice straw (RS).

Results

Although no significant effects were found on animal performance and carcass yield grade, the carcasses of MH group had higher marbling score and quality grade than those of RS and TH group (P < 0.05). Therefore, higher fat content (P < 0.001), lower shear force and hardness value in the beef of MH group than that of other groups were observed. Furthermore, the beef of MH group had higher CIE a* value (redness) than that of other groups and feeding MH to Hanwoo steers lowered n-6 to n-3 fatty acids ratio in beef.

Conclusions

Mixed hay provided benefits on meat quality and could be used for Hanwoo fattening program.

Keywords

Beef Hanwoo Hay Meat quality Orchard grass Red clover Straw Tall fescue Timothy grass

Background

The rapid economic change in Korea leads to the increasing demand of high quality beef. Hanwoo is a major beef cattle raised for highly marbled beef production in Korea, accounted about 85% of slaughtered cattle in 2016 [1]. As the demand of highly marbled beef increases, the use of grain-based diet during fattening also increases among beef cattle industries. However, acidosis becomes a problem when beef cattle entering fattening program due to excess supply of fermentable carbohydrate from concentrate feeding [2]. The inclusion of roughage in diet during fattening program has objective to control acidosis with impact to maintain the integrity and health of ruminal papillae and normal rates of nutrient absorption [3]. Furthermore, the higher content of n-6 fatty acids in grain-fed beef provides unbalance n-6 to n-3 essential fatty acids ratio in human diet that may lead to the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases [4]. Grass-based feeding is well known to reduce this risk by increasing the amount of n-3 essential fatty acids in beef [5]. Thus, adding roughage, hay in particular, could contribute to the health status of beef cattle and the production of healthy meat.

Most of hay products used as feed for beef cattle fattening program in Korea are produced locally. However, the quality remains lower than that of imported hay product as the main local product is rice straw. In 2011, rice straw accounted for 51.40% of total hay product produced locally and about 17.40% of the hay product was imported. Korean feed company utilized 80% of imported hay for total mixed ration (TMR) production, while the rest was distributed as roughage [6]. Van Soest [7] mentioned that rice straw contains high silica that contributes to its lower digestibility in ruminant. Although ammonia or urea treatment can enhance the intake and digestibility of rice straw, lower acceptance was reported as the concern of costs, labor, equipment, health, environment and social issues. Therefore, Korean government promotes local production of high quality hay product through mixing some grasses and legumes that are available from local source. The objective of this study was to compare the effects between mixed hay, rice straw and imported timothy hay supplementation during fattening on carcass traits and meat quality of Hanwoo steers.

Methods

Animals and diets

A total of 18 Hanwoo steers (25 ± 1.00 months old, 628 ± 61.84 kg) were randomly allocated to group pen (5 × 10 m) and fed for 150 days (May to October) at Gangwon Provincial Livestock Research Center’s farm. Each pen consisted of six animals with one diet treatment. Three different supplementary hay were used as treatment, as follows; rice straw as control (RS), mixed hay (MH) consisted of 55% orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.), 35% tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and 10% red clover (Trifolium pratense), which were grown and harvested from local region and imported timothy hay (TH). Nutrient composition of supplementary hay is shown in Table 1. Hay was given ad libitum three times a day (7:30, 13:00 and 18:00) following concentrate (12% of crude protein and 73% of total digestible nutrient). Given feed and residues were weighed and recorded daily. The animals had free access to water. Proximate composition, calcium and phosphor content of the forage were determined by the Association of Analytical Communities (AOAC) official methods [8] and detergent analysis was used for determining acid detergent and neutral detergent fiber [9].
Table 1

Chemical composition of supplementary hay

 

RS

MH

TH

Chemical composition

 Dry matter (% as fed)

89.40

89.60

88.73

 Crude protein (% DM)

6.02

7.43

9.41

 Crude fat (% DM)

1.72

2.66

2.20

 Crude fiber (% DM)

32.02

37.43

36.55

 Ash (% DM)

8.32

7.73

6.39

 Calcium (% DM)

1.24

1.22

1.17

 Phosphorus (% DM)

0.63

0.52

0.65

 Acid detergent fiber (% DM)

39.77

32.44

33.23

 Neutral detergent fiber (% DM)

55.47

64.03

63.11

RS rice straw, MH mixed hay, TH timothy hay

Carcass traits evaluation

After five months feeding period, the animals were slaughtered at local abattoir (Hoengseong, Korea) using standard procedure. The carcasses were weighed and then chilled at 2 ± 2 °C for 24 h in chilling room. Carcass yield and grade were estimated using the Korean carcass grading system [10]. Parameters used to determine yield grade (hot carcass weight, backfat thickness and ribeye area) and quality grade (marbling, meat color, fat color, firmness and maturity) were recorded. The longissimus thoracis muscle (rib eye) of each animal was collected from the left carcass for meat quality analysis. Samples were packed in polyethylene zipper bags, transported to laboratory and stored at −24 °C until analysis.

Meat quality analysis

Proximate composition analysis

The frozen samples were thawed at 2 ± 2 °C in chilling room for 36 h until internal temperature of 3 to 5 °C was reached. Sample was ground using a food blender at minimum speed for 10 sec (HMF-1600 PB, Hanil Electric, South Korea). Proximate composition was determined by AOAC official methods [8]. Moisture content was determined by drying the samples in the oven at 105 °C for 24 h. Crude fat content was determined by ether extraction using Soxhlet system. Nitrogen content was determined using the Kjeltec system (2200 Kjeltec Auto Distillation Unit, Foss, Sweden) and crude protein was calculated as nitrogen content multiplied by 6.25. Crude ash was determined by burning the samples in the muffle furnace at 550 °C for 12 h.

Instrumental surface color

The surface color was recorded by measuring the Commission International De L’ecairage (CIE) lightness (L*), redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) using a chromameter (CR-400, Konica Minolta Sensing Inc., Japan). The light source of illuminant C (2° observer) was standardized with a white plate (Y = 93.6, X = 0.3134, y = 0.3194). Surface color was assessed in triplicate.

pH, water holding capacity and drip loss

For pH measurement, a total of 5 g sample was added with 45 mL of distilled water and then homogenized at 10,000 rpm for 60 s using a homogenizer (PH91, SMT Co., Ltd., Japan). The pH value of the homogenized samples were recorded using a pH meter (SevenEasy pH, Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Switzerland). Water holding capacity (WHC) was defined as the percentage of moisture content that was hold by the meat during heating with centrifugation method [11]. Briefly, 5 g of ground samples were weighed into graduated centrifuge tubes, sealed and heated for 30 min in a 75 °C water bath. The tubes were cooled in flowing water for another 30 min, centrifuged at 980 g for 10 min at 24 °C. The supernatant was decanted and measured, and the moisture content of both raw sample and the supernatant was determined by AOAC method [8]. For drip loss, the samples were cut (1.5 cm thick), packed in polyethylene zipper bags and stored at 2 ± 1 °C for 6 days and then weighed. Drip loss percentage was expressed as weight loss during storage as described by Honikel [12].

Cooking loss and textural properties

The 2.5 cm thick-samples (70 g) were cooked in the polyethylene zipper bags until internal temperature of 72 °C was reached by immersing in water bath. The cooked samples were then removed off the polyethylene bags immediately, cooled down and weighed. Cooking loss was expressed as the percentage of weight loss during boiling. The cooked samples were cut (1 × 1 × 1 cm) and subjected to texture profile analysis and shear force measurement using TA-XT2i Plus (Stable Micro Systems, UK). For shear force measurement, the cut sample was placed on the table, under the V blade, and was cut through as the blade moved down with a constant speed through the slit of the table (assay parameters were: pre-test speed: 2.0 mm/s; test speed: 1.0 mm/s; post-test speed: 5.0 mm/s). A cylindrical 35 mm-diameter probe was used for all texture profile analysis in this study. The sample was placed under the probe that moved downwards at a constant speed of 2.0 mm/s (pre-test), 1.0 m/s (test), and 5.0 mm/s (post-test). Each assay was conducted using eight cuts from each sample.

Fatty acid composition

Fatty acid composition was determined using a gas chromatography (YL6500, YL Instrument, Korea). Lipid was extracted according to Folch et al. [13] with chloroform-methanol (2:1 v/v). Each sample was assessed 2 times. Fatty acids were converted into methyl esters as described by AOAC [8] with modifications. Briefly, 200 μL of lipid sample and 2 mL of 2 N NaOH were vortex-mixed and heated at 80 °C for 60 min. The samples were cooled by immersing in cold water, vortex-mixed with 2 mL of 25% BF3-MeOH, heated again at 80 °C for 60 min. After cooling for 10 min in cold water, the samples were mixed with 3 mL of distilled water and 2 mL of hexane, vortexed and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. About 1.5 mL of the upper layer was collected and moved into 2 ml-GC vials. One μL of sample was injected into the column in the split mode (100:1). Fatty acid methyl esters were separated using a SPTM-2560 fused-silica capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm, i.d. 0.20 μm film thickness; Supelco, Inc., USA) with a helium flow of 1.0 mL/min. The oven temperature was increased from 130 to 200 °C at 7 °C/min, held for 10 min, increased again to 250 °C at 5 °C/min, and finally held for 10 min. The temperatures of the injector and detector were 250 and 275 °C, respectively. Individual fatty acid was identified by comparison with the retention time and peak area of fatty acid standards (PUFA No. 2, 47015-U, Supelco, Inc., USA) and the proportion (%) was calculated by dividing its peak area with total peak area. Total fatty acid concentration (mg/100 g muscle) was calculated from meat crude fat content using a conversion factor of 0.92 for beef lipid and individual fatty acid concentration was calculated by multiplying its proportion with total fatty acids [14].

Statistical analysis

Completely randomized block design was used. Data were analyzed using linear mixed model with the “lme4” package in R-version 3.3.2 (The R-foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria). Individual animal effects were included as a random term, while diet effects were used as a fixed term. Non-parametric data (carcass yield grade and quality traits) were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis rank test. The statistical significance of the differences between means from different treatments was determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05) with “Agricolae” library.

Results and discussion

Animals’ body weight gain and feed intake are shown in Table 2. No significant differences were found on final weight, total and daily weight gain of the experimental animals among diet groups and no acidosis-related incidence was reported during experiment. Average daily gain (kg) of RS, MH and TH groups were 0.89, 0.99 and 0.85, respectively. Although no statistical differences were found, MH-fed cattle tend to having higher weight gain than other groups. The differences ranged from 0.10 to 0.14 kg between MH-RS group and MH-TH group, respectively. Owens et al. [15] mentioned if acidosis does not occur in a group of feedlot cattle, then the supplementation of hay will increase feed intake but not weight gain. However, a lower intake of TH was observed as a result of its higher protein content than other diets. Diets also did not influence all carcass yield traits significantly (Table 3). However, MH group had significantly higher marbling score and carcass quality grade (grade 1 to 1+, P < 0.05) than the others (grade 2 to 1). Concentrate used in this study was categorized as relatively low protein and low energy concentrate based on its crude protein and total digestible nutrient levels. These attributes might contribute to carcass quality grade [16]. Beef from MH group had the highest crude fat content (P < 0.001) and the lowest moisture content (P < 0.01), which is in line with its higher marbling score. Marbling is important to determining juiciness, tenderness and overall eating satisfaction or palatability of the beef. Hanwoo is one of cattle breeds that can be able to produce highly marbled beef and this ability starts functioning from 12 months of age. The lipogenesis is accelerated with advancing maturity [17, 18]. Beside genetic factor, diet also influences marbling. Pethick et al. [19] mentioned that the net energy in diet can be enhanced by increasing the digestible fiber and lipid content of diet. The fat and NDF content of MH were relatively higher than those of RS and along with slightly higher intake than TH-fed group, it is assumed that MH group gained more available energy for fat deposition than the others. The differences on moisture and crude fat content in meat did not affect protein and ash content. Table 4 shows no differences were found on meat crude protein and ash content. These results are in line with Park et al. [20] who reported a negative correlation between fat and moisture content in beef. These suggest that supplementation of different hay products have no significant effects on animal performance and carcass yield, but MH in particular enhanced marbling and carcass quality grade by providing more available energy for fat deposition.
Table 2

Body weight gain and feed intake of Hanwoo steers fed with different supplementary hay

 

RS

MH

TH

SEM

P value

Animal performance

 Initial weight (kg)

637.67

623.00

638.33

12.42

0.40

 Final weight (kg)

771.00

772.33

765.17

14.57

0.39

 Weight gain (kg)

133.33

149.33

126.83

5.28

0.21

 Average daily gain (kg)

0.89

0.99

0.85

0.05

0.22

Daily dry matter intake

 Concentrate (kg)

10.26

10.09

9.53

-

-

 Hay (kg)

0.99

1.01

0.72

-

-

 Total (kg)

11.25

11.10

10.25

-

-

 ADG/DDMIa

0.08

0.09

0.08

-

-

RS rice straw, MH mixed hay, TH timothy hay

SEM standard error of the means

Means within each row are not significantly different (P > 0.05)

aAverage daily gain to total daily dry matter intake ratio

Table 3

Carcass traits of Hanwoo steers fed with different supplementary hay

 

RS

MH

TH

SEM

P value

Yield traits

 Hot carcass weight (kg)

462.00

461.00

454.17

9.64

0.96

 Backfat thickness (mm)

15.33

15.33

13.67

0.90

0.78

 Ribeye area (cm2)

92.67

95.17

92.67

0.83

0.51

 Yield indexc

62.78

63.14

64.02

0.61

0.79

 Yield graded

2.50

2.33

2.17

0.32

0.73

Quality traits

 Marbling scoree

3.17b

5.39a

3.67b

0.35

0.02

 Meat colorf

5.00

5.00

5.00

0.00

0.39

 Fat colorg

3.00

3.00

3.00

0.00

0.39

 Firmnessh

1.83

1.17

1.33

0.10

0.06

 Maturityi

2.00

2.00

2.00

0.00

0.39

 Quality gradej

2.50b

3.60a

2.67b

0.16

0.01

RS rice straw, MH mixed hay, TH timothy hay

SEM: standard error of the means

Different superscripts a~b in the same row indicate differences among diet groups (P < 0.05)

c65.834-[0.393 x Backfat thickness (mm)] + [0.088 x Ribeye area (cm2)]-[0.008 x Carcass weight (kg)] + 2.01

dA grade (yield index ≥69.00) = 3, B grade (66.00 ≤ yield index < 69.00) = 2, C grade (yield index <66.00) = 1

eMarbling score standard; No.1-No.7 (1 = devoid, 7 = abundant)

f Meat color standard; No.1-No.7 (1 = brightly cherry red, 7 = extremely dark red)

gFat color standard; No.1-No.7 (1 = white, 7 = dark yellow)

hFirmness score; 1–3 (1 = soft, 3 = firm)

iMaturity score; 1–3 (1 = youthful, 3 = mature)

j1++ grade = 5, 1+ grade = 4, 1 grade = 3, 2 grade = 2, 3 grade = 1

Table 4

Meat proximate composition

 

RS

MH

TH

SEM

P value

Moisture (%)

67.51a

63.09b

64.84ab

0.65

<0.01

Crude fat (%)

10.99c

17.33a

14.96b

0.75

<0.001

Crude protein (%)

20.97

20.30

21.43

0.29

0.93

Ash (%)

0.89

0.88

0.87

0.01

0.33

RS rice straw, MH mixed hay, TH: timothy hay

SEM standard error of the means.

Different superscripts a~c in the same row indicate differences among diet groups (P < 0.05).

Color, which is the first characteristics noticed by consumers, plays an important role as an indicator of meat quality [21, 22]. Priolo et al. [23] found that iron from grass increases haemoglobin and myoglobin content in meat, whereas the yellowness is due to lipid-soluble β-carotene content from the cell wall of the grass. No significant differences on CIE L* value (lightness) of the meat among diet groups. Although no significant differences were found on the color of the carcass, the beef of MH samples had higher CIE a* value (redness) than the others and higher CIE b* value along with beef from RS group than that of TH group. These suggest that feeding MH supplies more iron than feeding RS and TH to Hanwoo steers.

Supplementation of MH tended to improve the deposition of fat in muscle. This high fat content affected the tenderness of the cooked samples, which agrees with Wood et al. [24] that total lipid content in muscle plays role in the tenderness. As shown in Table 5, beef from MH group, which contained 17.33% of fat, was more tender with lower shear force value and had overall softer texture with lower hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness and resilience than the others. As no differences were found on meat pH among diet groups, no differences were found on cooking loss, drip loss and water holding capacity.
Table 5

Meat quality traits of Hanwoo steers fed with different supplementary hay

 

RS

MH

TH

SEM

P value

pHultimate

5.60

5.63

5.60

0.01

0.41

CIE L*

42.89

44.20

42.71

0.60

0.65

CIE a*

20.80ab

21.32a

18.82b

0.33

0.02

CIE b*

10.39a

10.83a

9.46b

0.18

<0.01

Drip loss (%)

6.55

6.68

5.09

0.31

0.16

Water-holding capacity (%)

55.36

56.79

56.10

1.08

0.13

Cooking loss (%)

31.25

31.57

30.82

0.22

0.24

Shear force (kg)

6.21a

4.40b

4.80ab

0.25

0.04

Hardness (kg)

7.44a

5.75b

6.26ab

0.23

0.03

Springiness (cm)

0.51

0.51

0.51

0.01

0.62

Cohesiveness

0.43a

0.36b

0.42a

0.01

0.02

Gumminess (kg)

3.22a

2.10b

2.62ab

0.13

0.02

Chewiness (kg.cm)

1.62a

1.06b

1.34ab

0.06

0.02

Resilience

0.25a

0.19b

0.22a

0.01

<0.01

RS rice straw, MH: mixed hay, TH: timothy hay

SEM standard error of the means

Different superscripts a~b in the same row indicate differences among diet groups (P < 0.05)

Ten fatty acids were identified in the beef samples and the concentration (mg/100 g muscle) was also calculated. Table 6 shows that differences were observed on the content of all identified fatty acids as the fat content of the beef from different diet groups was also different significantly. The concentration of total identified fatty acids was higher in MH-fed beef, followed by TH and RS-fed beef, respectively. The concentration of total saturated fatty acids (SFA) was higher in the beef of MH and TH groups than in RS-fed beef. Among diet groups, MH-fed beef contained higher concentration of myristic acid (C14:0), palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0), followed by TH-fed beef and RS-fed beef, respectively. MH-fed beef also contained higher concentration of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) than the others including palmitoleic acid (C16:1n-7), oleic acid (C18:1n-9) and eicosenoic acid (C20:1n-9). Oleic acid was the major fatty acid, accounting for 46.76%, 47.19% and 47.09% for total fatty acids in the beef of RS, MH and TH group, respectively. These results agree with previous findings in Hanwoo beef [25]. No significant differences were found on the concentration of total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) between MH and TH-fed beef, while RS-fed beef had lower concentration than other diet groups. Among PUFA, the major contributor was linolenic acid (C18:2n-6), followed by alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3), arachidonic acid (C20:4n6) and eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n3). Significant differences between MH and TH-fed beef were observed only on the concentration of alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3). The concentration of alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) was higher in MH group, followed by TH and RS group, respectively. These differences led to lower the ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids in the beef samples of MH group than in that of other diet groups. The inclusion of red clover (10% as fed) in MH could contribute in the deposition of n-3 fatty acids to muscle fat. Scollan et al. [26] reported that red clover supplementation can be used to manipulate fatty acid composition in beef, in particular to reduce ruminal biohydrogenation of PUFA. High activity of polyphenol oxidase in red clover [27] may provide protective effects against biohydrogenation of dietary alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) in rumen.
Table 6

Fatty acid concentration (mg/100 g muscle) of longissimus thoracis obtained from Hanwoo steers fed with different supplementary hay

Compound

RS

MH

TH

SEM

P value

C14:0

492c

727a

643b

38.75

<0.001

C16:0

2960c

4665a

4059b

226

<0.001

C16:1n-7

443b

740a

581ab

43.29

0.01

C18:0

992c

1551a

1342b

68.97

<0.001

C18:1n-9

4728c

7510a

6481b

259

<0.001

C18:2n-6

365c

528a

477b

14.25

<0.001

C18:3n-3

40.44c

92.46a

61.92b

3.58

<0.001

C20:1n-9

36.40a

54.20a

39.91b

2.87

<0.001

C20:4n-6

45.50b

63.77a

66.05a

4.51

<0.001

C20:5n-3

8.09b

12.75a

12.38a

0.86

<0.001

Total fatty acids

10111c

15944b

13763a

816

<0.001

∑SFA

4445b

6943a

6044a

312

<0.001

∑MUFA

5207c

8304a

7102b

285

<0.001

∑PUFA

459b

697a

618a

31.56

<0.001

∑n-6

410b

591a

544a

18.84

<0.001

∑n-3

48.53c

105a

74.31b

19.03

<0.001

n-6/n-3

8.46a

5.64b

7.31a

0.16

0.01

RS rice straw, MH mixed hay, TH timothy hay

SEM standard error of the means

SFA saturated fatty acids, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acids

Different superscripts a~c in the same row indicate differences among diet groups (P < 0.05)

Conclusions

Supplementation of RS, MH and TH during fattening to Hanwoo steers had no different effects on growth performance and carcass weight and yield grade. However, feeding MH, consisting 55% of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.), 35% of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and 10% of red clover (Trifolium pratense), resulted in higher quality grade, marbling score, meat fat content, redness and lower shear force, hardness and n-6 to n-3 fatty acids ratio. Based on these evidences, MH from local source could be used as supplementary hay for Hanwoo fattening program.

Abbreviations

AOAC: 

The association of analytical communities

CIE: 

The Commission International De L’ecairage

MH: 

Mixed hay

MUFA: 

Monounsaturated fatty acids

PUFA: 

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

RS: 

Rice straw

SFA: 

Saturated fatty acids

TH: 

Timothy hay

TMR: 

Total mixed ration

WHC: 

Water holding capacity

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staffs in Gangwon Provincial Livestock Research Center, Hoengseong, Korea also students of Meat Science and Processing Technology Laboratory, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea for technical assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea with grant no. PJ011639042016.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

DTU performed the experiment and wrote the final manuscript. JHC performed the experiment, arranged the data and wrote the manuscript, CWL and YSP prepared the samples and designed the experiments. SKL supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Gangwon Provincial Livestock Research Center. Animals were transported to a commercial abattoir under the supervision of the Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Animal Life Sciences, Graduate School, Kangwon National University
(2)
Gangwon Provincial Livestock Research Center
(3)
Animal Products and Food Science Program, Division of Animal Applied Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University

References

  1. Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation (KAPE). Animal Grading Statistics. 2016. http://www.ekape.or.kr/view/user/main/main.asp. Accessed 23 Sep 2016.
  2. Nagaraja TG, Lechtenberg KF. Acidosis in feedlot cattle. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2007;23:333–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartley EE, Meyer RM, Call EP. Rumen metabolism and absorption of a 14C-labelled elastomeric copolymer and its value as a roughage substitute for cattle. J Anim Sci. 1981;52:1150–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Simopoulos AP. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56:365–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nuernberg K, Dannenberger D, Nuernberg G, Ender K, Voigt J, Scollan ND, Wood JD, Nute GR, Richardson RI. Effect of a grass-based and a concentrate feeding system on meat quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of longissimus muscle in different cattle breeds. Livest Prod Sci. 2005;94:137–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Hay product market brief. Global Agricultural Information Network Report. 2013. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed 30 March 2016.
  7. Van Soest PJ. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2006;130:137–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Van Soest PJ. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds I: preparation of fiber residues of low nitrogen content. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1963;46:825–35.Google Scholar
  10. Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation (KAPE). The Beef Carcass Grading. 2011. http://www.ekape.or.kr/view/eng/system/beef.asp. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  11. Kristensen L, Purslow PP. The effect of ageing on the water-holding capacity of pork: Role of cytoskeletal proteins. Meat Sci. 2001;58:17–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Honikel KO. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 1998;49:447–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Weihrauch JL, Posati LP, Anderson BA, Exler J. Lipid conversion factors for calculating fatty acid contents of foods. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1977;54:36–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill WJ, Gill DR. Acidosis in cattle: a review. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:275–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeong J, Seong NI, Hwang IK, Lee SB, Yu MS, Nam IS, Lee MI. Effects of level of CP and TDN in the concentrate supplement on growth performances and carcass characteristics in Hanwoo steers during final fattening period. J Anim Sci Technol. 2010;52:305–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chung CS, Kim NS, Song MK, Choi YI, Woon YS, Chung JK, Kim JG. Effects of age and feeding level of concentrates on adipose tissue lipogenesis and adipocyte size in Hanwoo bulls. Korean J Anim Sci. 2000;42:459–66.Google Scholar
  18. Lee SH, Park EW, Cho YM, Kim SK, Lee JH, Jeon JT, Lee CS, Im SK, Oh SJ, Thompson JM, Yoon D. Identification of differentially expressed genes related to intramuscular fat development in the early and late fattening stages of Hanwoo steers. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;40:757–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pethick DW, Harper GS, Oddy VH. Growth, development and nutritional manipulation of marbling in cattle: a review. Anim Prod Sci. 2004;44:705–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Park BY, Cho SH, Yoo YM, Kim JH, Lee JM, Joung SK, Kim YK. Effect of intramuscular fat contents on the physicochemical properties of beef longissimus dorsi from Hanwoo. Korean J Anim Sci. 2000;42:189–94.Google Scholar
  21. Jeremiah LE, Carpenter ZL, Smith GC. Beef color as related to consumer acceptance and palatability. J Food Sci. 1972;37(3):476–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Carpenter CE, Cornforth DP, Whittier D. Consumer preferences for beef color and packaging did not affect eating satisfaction. Meat Sci. 2001;57:359–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Priolo A, Micol D, Gabriel J. Effects of grass feeding systems on ruminant meat colour and flavor: A review. Anim Res. 2001;50:185–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, Hughes SI, Whittington FM. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2008;78:343–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hwang YH, Joo ST. Fatty acid profiles of ten muscles from high and low marbled (quality grade 1++ and 2) Hanwoo steers. Kor J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2016;36:679–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Scollan ND, Hocquette J, Nuernberg K, Dannenberger D, Richardson I, Moloney A. Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Sci. 2006;74:17–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee MRF, Parfitt LJ, Scollan ND, Minchin FR. Lipolysis in red clover with different polyphenol oxidase activities in the presence and absence of rumen fluid. J Sci Food Agric. 2007;87:1308–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement