Open Access

Himalayan dock (Rumex nepalensis): the flip side of obnoxious weed

Journal of Animal Science and Technology201557:34

DOI: 10.1186/s40781-015-0067-z

Received: 4 June 2015

Accepted: 15 September 2015

Published: 5 November 2015

Abstract

Himalayan dock (Rumex nepalensis) was evaluated for forage value and antinutrients under three, five and seven weeks cutting intervals in the temperate environment. Dry matter (DM) content was measured for each cutting interval. Forage quality parameters such as Crude Protein (CP), Acid Detergent fiber (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), Calcium (Ca) and Phosphorus (P) were analyzed. Plants with seven weeks cutting interval gave higher DM yield. CP and P content were significantly higher for three weeks cutting intervals. Average CP contents were 31.38 %, 30.73 % and 27.32 % and average P content 0.58 %, 0.52 % and 0.51 % for three, five and seven weeks cutting intervals, respectively. Ca content did not differ significantly between cutting intervals. The average Ca content were 0.91 %, 0.90 % and 90 %, for three, five and seven weeks cutting intervals, respectively. Tannin and mimosine contents were not significantly different between cutting intervals. Average tannin contents were 1.32 %, 1.27 % and 1.26 % and mimosine 0.38 %, 0.30 % and 0.28 % for three, five and seven weeks cutting intervals, respectively. The study concluded that R. nepalensis could be a potential source of protein for livestock. The study also suggests seven weeks harvesting interval to provide plants with high dry matter yield, high forage quality and very low levels of anti-nutrients.

Keywords

Acid detergent fiber Anti-nutrient Crude protein Dry matter Neutral detergent fiber Rumex nepalensis

Background

Rumex nepalensis or the Himalayan dock belongs to the family Polygonaceae. It is commonly sighted at higher altitudes and grows between 900–4000 m on moist as well as dry slopes, under shades, and even in plains. R. nepalensis have broad ecological tolerances. It is a common weed in pastures and the plants are known to become dominant and outcompete desirable pasture species and degrade pasture quality. It regenerates from tap roots and establishes quickly as seedlings. Once established, tough tap roots become difficult to remove and are not readily killed by tillage. These characteristics have often made farmers to regard this species as the most difficult weed [1]. The general issues of Rumex spp are that they are weeds of grassland, particularly on disturbed areas with high fertility.

However, available literatures suggest that this species possess other characteristics. From the forage perspective, Humaira et al. [2] noted the moderate palatability of leaves of R. nepalensis to goat. At the young phenological stages of growth, the plants of R. nepalensis are leafy and Al Haj Khaled et al. [3] positively associated leafiness to higher crude protein (CP) and digestibility. While the leaf CP of matured R. nepalenses is about 14 % [4], the leaf CP of young plants of this species is over 32 % [5]. These reports highlight difference in CP content of this species according to phenological growth stages besides indicating that the young plants of R. nepalensis could be a good source of protein. Despite the higher CP content, R. nepalensis has been least studied for its forage value. Further, there is also a lack of information on the anti-nutritive properties of R. nepalensis. Anti-nutritional factors in animal feed are known to reduce the availability of one or more nutrients to the animal.

Feed represents the largest single production expense for cattle production. Protein is a critical dietary nutrient in all cattle feed, yet the high cost of commercial protein supplements is one of the main limitations to efficient animal production by smallholders [6]. On the contrary, the pasture based cattle production is relatively cheaper, however, the cattle farmers must ensure that the forages are supplemented with adequate protein and energy to meet the nutritional demands of animals. In such scenario, the use of protein rich plant sources can reduce demand for protein ingredients from expensive commercial feed sources. Thus, protein from plant resources can reduce the overall production cost. To generate estimates of forage quality and anti-nutritive factors, a study was conducted with the objectives to evaluate difference in forage value and anti-nutritive properties between three phenological growth stages of R. nepalensis in the Himalayan highland.

Methods

Experimental site

The study was conducted in Bumthang valley in central Bhutan. Bumthang lies at an altitude of 2700 m and is one of the focal districts for pasture development in Bhutan. The valley is situated in the north central temperate region with an area of about 2715 km2 [7]. Most pasture fields are on rugged terrain and normally spread across slopes with gradients ranging from 0–35° [8]. The climate is dominated by the Indian monsoon with high levels of precipitation between June and September followed by cold and dry winter. The mean maximum precipitation of 152 mm is recorded in the month of July and August, and the mean maximum temperature of 22 °C is recorded in June and the mean minimum temperature of −2.7 °C in January [8]. The vegetation growing period commences from May and peaks in August with gradual decline in temperature from September. Winter is cold and dry from November to March.

Description of species under study

R. nepalensis is a perennial herb. Roots are large and stems erect. The plants are 50–100 cm tall. Basal leaves have petiole length of 4–10 cm. Leaf blade is broadly ovate. Inflorescence is paniculate and flowers are bisexual. The plants grow in the altitude range of 900–4000 m and are commonly seen on grassy slopes, moist valleys and along ditches.

Experimental design and treatments

The experimental design was a randomized complete block. The treatment was cutting interval of three types, three, five and seven weeks intervals with five replications. The experiment was established by demarcating plots on existing vegetation of R. nepalensis. The individual plot size was 1 m2. Spacing were 50 cm between plots and 70 cm between replications. The plants were grown under natural conditions without fertilizer application. The treatments were applied on June 25, July 8 and July 22 for three, five and seven weeks cutting intervals, respectively.

Estimation of DM, forage value and anti-nutrients

Plants in each plot were clipped and weighed for fresh weight. The clipped samples were processed and oven dried at 60 °C for 48 h. Dried sample weight was recorded and the DM per hectare area was estimated. Following DM estimation, the dried samples were processed and analyzed for total nitrogen (N). The total nitrogen content in the sample was determined with Kjeldahl method and CP was estimated as % N × 6.25. The estimate was compared with the CP content of other high quality forages. ADF was estimated following the procedures described by Goering and Van Soest [9] and NDF with methods of Van Soest [10]. Ca and P were estimated with methods of AOAC [11].

The anti-nutrients estimated were mimosine and tannin. Mimosine content was estimated with the calorimetric method described by Matsumoto and Sherman [12] while tannin content was estimated using vanillin hydrochloric acid method of Burn [13].

Data analysis

The dataset was tested for normalcy and homogeneity of variances using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. Wherever required, data was logarithmically transformed to meet the assumptions of ANOVA. Differences in the means of morphological traits, CP, Ca, P and anti-nutrients between cutting intervals were assessed with several one-way ANOVAs. Differences between means were considered significant if P values were lower than 0.05. The entire dataset was analysed with SPSS 22 [14].

Results

Morphological traits, Crude protein and anti-nutrients

DM content was significantly higher for plants receiving 7 week cutting interval (Fig. 1a). CP in actively growing plants of R. nepalensis varied among cutting intervals. CP declined with increasing cutting interval. CP content was significantly lower for the plants subjected to seven weeks cutting interval than those under three and five weeks cutting intervals (Fig. 1b). Ca level was not significantly different between cutting intervals (Fig. 1c). However, P was significantly greater for R. nepalensis under three weeks cutting intervals (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

a Dry matter (DM) b Crude protein (CP) c Calcium (ca) and d Phosphorus (P) of R. nepalensis under 3, 5 and 7 weeks cutting intervals

Both ADF and NDF were significantly higher for plants under seven weeks cutting interval (Fig. 2a and b). Although non-significant, the tannin and mimosine content were higher for the plants subjected to three weeks cutting interval (Fig. 3a and b).
Fig. 2

a ADF and b NDF of R. nepalensis under 3, 5 and 7 weeks cutting intervals

Fig. 3

a Tannin and b Mimosine of R. nepalensis under 3, 5 and 7 weeks cutting intervals

Comparison with other important feed resources revealed R. nepalensis to possess greater level of CP, Ca and P than white clover and willow leaves (Table 1). However, the CP, Ca and P contents were comparable with the Karma feed, a commercial feed concentrate known to be of higher quality.
Table 1

Comparison of CP content of different feed and forage resources

Feed resource

CP %

Ca %

P %

Ca:P

1. Karma concentrate feed (starter)

21.69a

0.86a

0.58a

1.4:1

2. Karma concentrate feed (Finisher)

20.59a

0.75a

0.47a

1.6:1

3. White clover

18.00b

1.75d

0.33d,c

5.3:1

4. Willow leaves

16.00b

2.02e

0.28e

7.2:1

5. R. nepalensis (3 weeks old)

31.38c

0.91c

0.58c

1.6:1

6. R. nepalensis (5 weeks old)

30.73c

0.90c

0.52c

1.7:1

7. R. nepalensis (7 weeks old)

27.32c

0.90c

0.52c

1.7:1

aWangchuk and Nidup [19], bRoder et al. [26], cThis study, dFrame and Newbould [27], eUpreti and Shrestha [15]

Discussion

CP, fiber and mineral content

The present study shows that cutting intervals below five weeks provide CP over 30 %, which is closer to the leaf CP content of 32 % reported by Abbasi et al. [5]. Although high in CP, the short intervals are disadvantaged by low DM yield. Amongst cutting intervals, the seven weeks interval appears to provide optimum CP and higher DM yield. From forage standpoint, seven weeks seem to be an optimal cutting interval for R. nepalensis, from which a balance between forage yield and quality can be expected. CP content of seven weeks interval is about 27 %, which translates to 270 g CP kg−1 DM. Upreti and Shrestha [15] categorize feeds and forages with CP 20 % and above as high quality roughages and R. nepalensis falls in this category. This evidently highlights the potential of R. nepalensis to make valuable contributions to the nutritive value of forage-based diets. According to Topps [16], if forage legume is used as protein source for milk production in grass based diet the legume should contain not less than 160 g CP kg−1 DM to obtain a desirable protein level of 100 g CP per kg DM in the final diet. Ruminants require minimum of 150 g CP kg−1 DM for lactation and growth [17]. For the early lactating cows, Linn [18] recommends ration containing 18-19 % CP or 180–190 g CP kg−1 DM. The CP of R. nepalensis is much higher than the required level and in excess in the range of 80–110 g CP kg−1 DM, which strongly suggests that R. nepalensis can be a protein rich source to support milk production. However, harvest beyond seven weeks interval may cause further decline in CP content below 20 %, which will categorize plants as moderate quality roughages [15].

The CP percentage of R. nepalensis is higher than the other important temperate forage resources such as white clover, willow leaves and grass-clover pasture, but compares well with Lucerne hay and Karma feed, the popular concentrate feed in Bhutan. This further reiterates that R. nepalensis if harvested at early stages of growth could be a protein rich supplement in cattle feed. Thus, R. nepalensis has potential to provide alternative low-cost protein to meet the nutritive requirements of cattle in smallholder farms. However, owing to low DM yield, it is likely that the CP yield in terms of kg ha−1, might be lower than other feed resources. This could be a disadvantage when the demand for dietary protein is high. Martens et al. [6] asserts that, in the smallholder farms, fast growth rates demand an optimum supply of dietary protein, which may not be met by the locally-grown feeds.

Both ADF and NDF content increased with increasing cutting intervals with highest content under seven weeks cutting interval. However, the values were below 31 % and 40 % for ADF and NDF, respectively. According to Upreti and Shrestha [15], forages with ADF below 31 % and NDF below 40 % are categorized as roughages with good digestibility. This highlights that R. nepalensis can still have good digestibility even when harvested at seven weeks interval. However, similar to CP, the cutting interval greater than seven weeks may be less desirable as it is likely to cause decline in digestibility below the desired level.

The calcium and phosphorus content under seven weeks cutting interval were about 0.90 % (9 g kg−1 DM), 0.52 % (5.2 g kg−1 DM), respectively. For grasses and forage legumes, Upreti and Shrestha [19] categorize Ca content below 2 % as low and P content above 0.5 % as high. Therefore, the Ca content of R.nepalensis must be considered low and inadequate to be included in the ration of a lactating cow that requires a minimum of 0.75 % Ca whereas P level is high enough [18].

Anti-nutrients

Tannin and mimosine were two main antinutrients present in R. nepalensis. Tannins has been found to reduce the digestibility of protein and carbohydrates including starch and fibers, and has bitter and astringent taste, which in many cases reduces palatability and can depress growth [6]. In this study, the tannins in R. nepalensis under all cutting intervals were below 1.3 %, which translates to 13 g kg−1 DM. The amount is far below than the total tannin content of oak leaves (Quercus semecarpifolia) (78 g kg−1 DM) [20], an important tree fodder in the Himalayan region. According to Barry and Manley [21], forage containing more than 5 % tannins are tannins rich forages. Tannins with 5 to 10 % in the feed are antinutritive and toxic [22]. The tannin level of R. nepalensis must be considered very low. In contrast to the toxic effects of high tannin level, the low tannin level has been reported to have beneficial effects. Low tannin level protects protein of forages and allows a high efficiency of feed utilization by the animal [23]. This likely explains why there has been no field reports of animal poisoning by this species.

Mimosine is the second antinutrient found in R. nepalensis. Under all cutting intervals, the mimosine level was below 0.38 %, which translates roughly to 3.8 g kg−1 DM. The toxic effects are found to manifest when levels of mimosine in diets exceed 0.015 % of animal’s body weight [24]. In terms of DM weight, the toxic amount calculates to 45 g per 300 kg body weight, which is the standard live body weight of one livestock unit consuming 6 kg dry matter in the Bhutan Himalaya [25]. If one livestock unit feeds on R. nepalensis vegetation, the amount of mimosine likely to be consumed estimates to just over 20 g per 6 kg DM. This is far below the lethal amount and very unlikely to cause toxic effects.

Conclusion

R. nepalensis has high CP content under all cutting intervals but seven weeks interval provides high dry matter yield. High CP, low fiber and P content except Ca qualify R. nepalensis to be graded as a prime feed and a potential source of protein. Level of antinutrients is very low and plants are safe for use as protein supplement. The results of this study have value for farmers and development workers. Although high in overall quality, there is a need for further studies on the effects of feeding R. nepalensis on milk production. Further, the combination of this species with other feeds should also be studied to establish optimum levels of inclusion to maximize feed intake. Finally, rather than viewing R. nepalensis as difficult weed, much would be gained if it is utilized as a protein supplement for livestock.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Mr. Karma Dorji and Mr. Dhurba Ghalley in conducting the field work. The author is very thankful to the Feed and Forage Analysis Section, Bureau of Animal Nutrition Development, Department of Livestock Development, Thailand for analysing the plant samples.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Renewable Natural Resources Research and Development Center

References

  1. Parker C. Weeds of Bhutan. Thimphu, Bhutan, United Kingdom: Royal Government of Bhutan, National Plant Protection Center; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Humaira S, Rahmatullah Q, Shahid I, Mirza FQ. Seasonal availability and palatability of native flora of Santh Saroola Kotli Sattian, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Afr J of Plant Sci. 2014;8:92–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Haj Khaled R, Duru M, Decruyenaere V, Journey C, Cruz P. Using leaf traits to rank native grasses according to their nutritive value. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 2006;59:648–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hameed I, Dastagir G. Nutritional analyses of Rumex hastatus D. Don, Rumex dentatus Linn and Rumex nepalensis Spreng. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8:4131–33.Google Scholar
  5. Abbasi AM, Shah MH, Khan MA. Wild Edible Vegetables of Lesser Himalayas: Ethnobotanical and Nutraceutical Aspects 2015;1:1–360.
  6. Martens SD, Tiemann TT, Bindelle J, Peters M, Lascano CE. Alternative plant protein sources for pigs and chickens in the tropics – nutritional value and constraints: a review. J Agr Rural Dev Trop. 2012;113:101–23.Google Scholar
  7. MoA. Dzongkhag data sheets for Bumthang. Thimphu, Bhutan: Ministry of Agriculture; 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Wangchuk K. Species Composition of Improved Dairy Pasture in Bumthang, Bhutan. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: The University of Melbourne; 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Washington DC: USDA Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture; 1970
  10. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1995.Google Scholar
  12. Matsumoto H, Sherman GD. A rapid colorimetric method for the determination of mimosine. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1951;33:195–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Burn ER. Methods for estimation of tannin in grain sorghum. Agron J. 1971;63:511–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Landau S, Everitt S. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using SPSS. New York, USA: CRC Press Company Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2004
  15. Upreti CR, Shrestha BK. Nutrient Contents of Feeds and Fodder in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal Agriculture Research Council; 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Topps JH. Assessment of forage legumes as protein-rich supplement in ruminant production systems in Zimbabwe. In: Ndikumana J, de Leeuw P, editors. Proceedings of the Second African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET) Workshop. Harare, Zimbabwe: African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET); 1993. p. 201.Google Scholar
  17. Norton BW. Differences between species in forage quality. In: Hacker JB, editor. Nutritional limits to animal production from pastures. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1982. p. 89–110.Google Scholar
  18. Linn J. Ration Guidelines for Milking and Dry Cows. Minnesota Dairy Initiatives Dairy Diagnostics Tool Box. Minnesota, USA: Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota; 2015
  19. Wangchuk P, Nidup K. Evaluation of Broiler Feeds. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual National Livestock Coordination Workshop (Research and Extension). 2007:50-53.
  20. Raju J, Sahoo B, Chandrakar A, Sankar M, Garg AK, Sharma AK, et al. Effect of feeding oak leaves (Quercus semecarpifolia vs Quercus leucotricophora) on nutrient utilization, growth performance and gastrointestinal nematodes of goats in temperate sub Himalayas. Small Ruminant Res. 2015;125:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Barry TN, Manley TR. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep 2. Quantitative digestion of carbohydrate and Protein. Brit J Nutr. 1984;51:493–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lohan OP, Lall D, Pall RN, Negi SS. Note on tannins in tree fodders. Indian J Anim Sci. 1980;50:881–3.Google Scholar
  23. Seresinhe T, Pathirana KK. Forage tannins in ruminant nutrition. Trop Agr Res Ext. 2003;6:29–43.Google Scholar
  24. Szyszka M, Termeulen U. The reaction of sheep to the consumption of the toxic mimosine in Leucaena leucocephala. J Anim Physiol An N. 1985;53:65–9.Google Scholar
  25. Samdup T, Udo HMJ, Eilers CHAM, Ibrahim MNM, VandZijpp AJ. Crossbreeding and intensification of smallholder crop-cattle farming systems in Bhutan. Livest Sci. 2010;132:126–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Roder W, Wangdi K, Gyamtsho P and Dorji K. Feeding the Herds: Improving Fodder Resources in Bhutan, ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal: 2001.
  27. Frame J and Newbould P. Agronomy of white clover. Adv. Agron. 1986;40:1-88.

Copyright

© Wangchuk. 2015

Advertisement