Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Intake and performance of lambs finished in feedlot with wet brewer’s grains

  • Mônica Feksa Frasson1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Sérgio Carvalho1,
  • Gustavo Jaurena2,
  • Aliei Maria Menegon1,
  • Marcelo Machado Severo1,
  • Juliano Henriques da Motta1 and
  • William Soares Teixeira1
Journal of Animal Science and Technology201860:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-018-0166-8

Received: 22 December 2017

Accepted: 28 March 2018

Published: 14 May 2018

Abstract

Background

The use of agroindustrial by-products in ruminant nutrition to be an interesting alternative in order to reduce production costs and environmental impacts arising from the inadequate destination of residues. The initial step of beer production yields a large volume of wet brewer’s grains all year around, which is available at a low cost and has a high nutritional quality, and hence a big potential for animal production.

Methods

Twenty-four Suffolk non-castrated male lambs, from simple parturition were kept in individual spots and allocated to four treatments constituted by four levels of substitution of sorghum silage by WBG (i.e.0; 33.5; 66.5 and 100% of substitution). It was used roughage: concentrate rate of 50:50, based on dry matter.

Results

The ether extract intake increased while the acid detergent fiber intake decreased linearly (P ≤ 0.05). Substituion of sorghum silage by WBG did not change lambs’ feed DMI, daily weight gain and feed conversion.

Conclusion

The substitution of sorghum silage by WBG as roughage showed to be a viable alternative from the productive and economic point of view for finishing of feedlot lambs.

Keywords

Feed conversionOvinesWeight gain

Background

In the last 30 years, the main objectives of sheep production systems have changed from wool to meat production, due to consumer demands accompanied by animal breeding and nutritional improvements. The main meat productive category is lambs, which have high feed conversion, body weight gain and carcass quality, concomitantly with high nutritional requirements during the first months of life [1].

Lamb feedlot fattening systems are an important alternative to stabilize meat quality and product offer throughout the year. Among other benefits to the production systems traditionally used, it may be highlighted the improvement on the animals sanitary condition, money turnover rate, uniformity of meat quality all year around, reduction of slaughter age and the availability of field and forage areas of pasture for the other categories of the herd [2].

Agroindustrial residues are unconventional protein or energetic sources of great potential value for farmers in the effort to intensify and reduce costs, they also reduce the environmental impacts from the inadequate destination of residues [3]. The beer industry yields a large volume of wet brewer’s grains (WBG) all year around, which is available at a low cost and has a high nutritional quality, and hence a big potential for animal production. This by-product has a high quality variation; the crude protein concentration varies from 170 to 350 g/kg dry matter –DM [4] and Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) from 550 to 650 g/kg DM [5].

This work was conducted with the objective of assessing the voluntary intake and meat production of intensive reared lambs fed with wet brewer’s grains as roughage feed in substitution of sorghum silage.

Methods

The work was performed at the Sheep Department of the Polytechnic School of Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) between October and December 2013. The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the same institution (Protocol N° 037/2014). Laboratory analysis were performed at the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition (Federal University of Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil).

Twenty-four Suffolk non-castrated male lambs, from single parturition were weaned with an average age of 60 days, properly dewormed (IVOMEC Ovinos 1000 mL – Ivermectina Merial a 0,08%) and inoculated against clostridium (SINTOXAN® Polivalente). After being weaned, animals were allocated to individual stalls (2 m2 each) within a shelter, with rice hull bedding, and equipped with individual feeders and drinking fountains. The lambs were allocated in a complete randomized experimental design (CRD) with four treatments, constituted by different levels of substitution of roughage (sorghum silage) by WBG (0%; 33%; 66% and 100% of substitution) and six repetitions.

The lambs were weighted and assessed by condition score (scale from 1 to 5; [6]) at the beginning of the experiment, and every 14 days with an 18 h fasting [7]. The experiment started after 10 days of adaptation (facilities, feeding and handling conditions), and extended until animals were slaughtered when body condition score = 3.

The WBG used on the present study was acquired in a brewing agribusiness in Santa Maria and was preserved as silage. The diets were isonitrogenous and formulated according to NRC [8] in order to obtain 200 g of daily weight gain. Animals were fed ad libitum (15% leftovers) offering equal quantities at 08:00 h and 17:00 h. The ration (50:50 roughage: concentrate ratio, on dry matter basis) combined a concentrate (ground corn, soybean meal and mineral mixture) and the roughage, according to the experimental treatment (sorghum silage and WBG; Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

Chemical composition on a dry matter basis (g/kg) of ingredients used in the experimental diets

 

Chemical composition (g/kg)

 

Sorghum silage

Wet brewer’s grains

Ground corn

Soybean meal

Calcitic limestone

Dicalcium phosphate

Salt

DM

325

275

884

880

1000

1000

1000

OM

955

913

985

932

CP

42

244

96

531

EE

14

67

44

21

aNDFom

645

560

140

146

ADF

392

225

44

98

TCH

898

602

844

380

NFC

254

42

704

234

ME (Mcal/kg DM)

2,201

2,601

3,081

2,852

Hemic

253

335

Cell

311

142

ADL

81

83

Ashes

45

87

15

68

1000

Ca

3

2

0,3

3

340

220

P

2

7

2

6

0.2

190

DM dry matter, OM organic matter, CP crude protein, EE ether extract, aNDFom neutral detergent fiber, ADF acid detergent fiber, TCH total carbohydrates, NFC non-fibrous carbohydrates, ME metabolizable energy, Hemic hemicellulose, Cell cellulose, ADL lignin, ashes, Ca calcium, P phosphorus

1Estimated by National Forage Testing Association [14].2Estimated by Van Soest [15]

Table 2

Proportion of ingredients (% DM) and chemical composition (g/Kg) of dry matter in the experimental diets.

 

Wet brewer’s grains levels (%)

 

0

33

66

100

Proportion of ingredients (% DM)

Fiber

Sorghum silage

50.0

33.2

16.7

0.0

Wet brewer’s grains

0.0

16.7

33.2

50.0

Concentrate

Ground corn

18.4

26.2

33.9

41.6

Soybean meal

28.1

20.3

12.6

4.8

Calcitic limestone

1.5

1.8

2.1

2.4

Dicalcium phosphate

1.0

0.6

0.3

0.0

Salt

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Total

100

100

100

100

Chemical composition (g kg−1 DM)

Dry matter level

607

600

591

583

Organic matter

920

920

915

912

Crude protein

188

188

188

188

Ether extract

21

32

42

53

Neutral detergent fiber

389

374

360

345

Acid detergent fiber

232

200

170

136

Total carbohydrates

714

700

685

671

Non-fibrous carbohydrates

322

323

325

326

ME (Mcal/kg dry matter)1

2,47

2,55

2,64

2,72

Ashes

80

82

84

89

Calcium

10

10

10

10

Phosphorus

5

5

5

5

1Metabolizable energy

Every three days, feeds and leftovers samples were collected and every 21 days a pool sample was composed, stored in plastic bags at − 18 °C for subsequent laboratory analysis. For chemical analysis, ingredients samples and leftovers were dried at 55 °C for 72 h. Subsequently, samples were ground (2-mm screen; Willey type mill, Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA) and analyzed for dry matter (DM; Method 934.01 [9]), organic matter (OM; Method 942.05 [9]), ash (Method 942.05), and ether extract (EE; Method 920.39 [9]). The Crude Protein content (CP = N × 6.25) was determined by Kjeldahl (Method 984.13 [9]).

Neutral Detergent Fiber was expressed free of residual ash (aNDFom; Van Soest et al. [10]), and using heat-stable α-amylase and without sulphite (based on Mertens [11]). Acid detergent fiber (ADF) was assessed according to Method 973.18 of AOAC [12]; both method were done by using an autoclave at 110 °C for 40 min [13]. For Acid detergent lignin (ADL), bags containing residual ADF were treated with 12 M H2SO4 for 3 h (Method 973.18; [12]).

Non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC; % in the DM) were computed as 100 – (CP + NDF + EE + ash) [11], and Total carbohydrates (TCH) as 100 - (%CP + %EE + % ASH). Metabolizable energy (ME, Mcal kg -1 ) was computed as ME = %TDN/(4.4 × 0.82), while %TDN = 31.4 + (53.1 x NEL) for silage [14] and ME (Mcal/kg DM) = 3,32–0,055 x %ADF for corn grain [14], ME (Mcal/kg DM) = 3,6/100 × ((100-%FDN) × 0,98 + %FDN×(1473–0,789 log10 (LDA/FDA × 100))–12,9) for soybean meal [15].

Voluntary feed intake was computed through the difference between offered and leftovers (on DM basis) for DM, OM, CP, EE, NDF, ADF, TC, NFC and TDN.

Results were analyzed according to a completely randomized experimental design with four experimental diets, and six repetitions. Analysis of Variance and Regression Analysis were performed using SAS statistical package [16]. Differences among treatment means were declared whenever P ≤ 0.05.

Results and discussion

The WBG by-product had higher concentrations of CP and EE than Sorghum silage, but aNDFom, ADF and ADL concentrations were similar for both feeds (Table 1). The chemical characteristics of WBG were coherent with typical values reported by Feedipedia [17], though ashes and LDA were higher. On the other hand, sorghum silage composition was typical for Brazil and very similar to values tabulated by Valadares Filho et al. [18]. The diets composition reflected the different sorghum silage/WBG ratios, with increasing values of EE and ME and decreasing values of aNDFom and ADF as the proportion of WBG increased.

When sorghum silage was used as the unique supplement, ADF concentration (232 g kg− 1 DM) was higher than that observed for 100% WBG inclusion (136 g kg− 1 DM; Table 2); the rest of the treatments had ADF concentrations in accordance with sorghum silage: WBG ratio. Normally, higher ADF values would reduce the performance of lambs as a consequence of the expected reduction in digestibility (Van Soest, [15]).

In this study, voluntary feed intake was higher (4.12% body weight (BW); Table 3) than predicted by NRC [8] for late maturity lambs (i.e. 2.97% of BW) and was not influenced (P > 0.05) by WBG proportion in the final diet (Table 2). This was a probable consequence of the similar NDF concentration in all the experimental diets, which lead to a range of NDF intakes from 1.24 to 1.50% BW. Lambs daily intakes were higher than those observed by Kozloski et al. [19], who found that sorghum silage could be incorporated into the ration up to c.a. 30% of DMI (2.7% BW) or c.a. 0.80% BW of NDF intake. Lack of differences were also reported in dairy cows by Geron et al. [20] (inclusion up to 15% of fermented brewer’s residue in diets containing also corn silage, pre-dried ryegrass silage and concentrate), and other authors using WBG up to 16% [21] and 10% on a DM basis [22]. As DMI was not affected by treatments, changes in NDF consumption as % BW reflected changes in NDF ration concentration, hence that the high levels of daily DMI recorded (4.03% BW) and the trend to reduce DMI as WBG increased would lead to speculate that animals were within the chemostatic intake regulation range.
Table 3

Average daily intake according for the experimental rations

 

Percentage of wet brewer’s grains

   
 

0

33

66

100

Regression equation

R2

Pr > F

Intake as % of body weight (Mean ± Standard deviation)

DM

4.04 ± 0.5

4.26 ± 0.4

3.98 ± 0.5

3.83 ± 0.4

Ῡ = 4.03

0.29

OM

3.73 ± 0.4

3.92 ± 0.3

3.67 ± 0.5

3.53 ± 0.4

Ῡ = 3.71

0.28

CP

0.81 ± 0.1

0.83 ± 0.1

0.76 ± 0.1

0.70 ± 0.1

Ῡ = 0.77

0.02

EE

0.08 ± 0.01

0.13 ± 0.01

0.16 ± 0.02

0.19 ± 0.02

1

0.83

<.0001

NDF

1.44 ± 0.2

1.50 ± 0.2

1.33 ± 0.2

1.24 ± 0.2

Ῡ = 1.37

0.03

ADF

0.84 ± 0.1

0.77 ± 0.1

0.60 ± 0.1

0.45 ± 0.1

2

0.73

<.0001

TCH

2.84 ± 0.3

2.95 ± 0.2

2.74 ± 0.3

2.63 ± 0.3

Ῡ = 2.80

0.17

NFC

1.38 ± 0.2

1.43 ± 0.1

1.38 ± 0.1

1.36 ± 0.2

Ῡ = 1.38

0.68

Intake as kg/day in DM (Mean ± Standard deviation)

DM

1.30 ± 0.2

1.44 ± 0.2

1.38 ± 0.3

1.26 ± 0.2

Ῡ = 1.35

0.68

OM

1.20 ± 0.2

1.33 ± 0.2

1.27 ± 0.2

1.16 ± 0.2

Ῡ = 1.24

0.66

CP

0.26 ± 0.04

0.28 ± 0.05

0.26 ± 0.05

0.23 ± 0.04

Ῡ = 0.26

0.18

EE

0.02 ± 0.005

0.04 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

3

0.63

<.0001

NDF

0.46 ± 0.1

0.50 ± 0.1

0.46 ± 0.1

0.41 ± 0.1

Ῡ = 0.46

0.23

ADF

0.27 ± 0.04

0.26 ± 0.05

0.20 ± 0.05

0.15 ± 0.03

4

0.53

<.0001

TCH

0.91 ± 0.1

1.00 ± 0.1

0.95 ± 0.2

0.87 ± 0.1

Ῡ = 0.93

0.53

NFC

0.44 ± 0.1

0.49 ± 0.1

0.48 ± 0.1

0.45 ± 0.1

Ῡ = 0.46

0.98

ME Mcal/day

3.26 ± 0.5

3.72 ± 0.6

3.68 ± 0.7

3.51 ± 0.5

Ῡ = 3.54

0.52

DM dry matter, OM organic matter, CP crude protein, EE ether extract, NDF neutral detergent fiber, ADF acid detergent fiber, TCH total carbohydrates, NFC non-fibrous carbohydrates, ME Metabolizable energy

1- Ŷ = 0.08276 + 0.00121× WBR

2- Ŷ = 0.86761–0.00375× WBR

3- Ŷ = 0.02698 + 0.00041047× WBR

4- Ŷ = 0.28136–0.00114 × WBR

Similarly, differences in chemical fractions intake were accounted for changes in feedstuffs composition. Hence that as WBG proportion increased EE intake was raised (P < 0.001; Table 3), reaching a maximum of 5% of total DMI when 100% of WGB was used as supplement. According to Willians [23], this supply should be limited to a maximum of 5% to avoid negative effects on dietary fiber digestibility and DM intake. Consequently, it may be concluded that EE did not reach levels that could reduced intake.

Growth rate, feed conversion and body condition score did not change with rate of WBG inclusion (Table 4) even when diets with higher WBG levels had higher concentrations of ME and lower concentrations of ADF (Table 2). However, the impact of higher WBG inclusion it is also expected to have increased by-pass protein supply as suggested by other authors reports Clark et al. [24] and Satter [25].
Table 4

Average values of initial body weight (IBW), final body weight (FBW), daily weight gain (DWG), feed conversion (FC) and body condition score (BCS) according to the sorghum silage replacement levels by wet brewer’s grains

 

Diets

   
 

0

33

66

100

Regression equation1

R2

Pr > F

Performance of lambs (Mean ± Standard deviation)

IBW (kg)

24.7 ± 4.0

25.8 ± 5.2

25.0 ± 3.8

25.6 ± 4.0

Ῡ = 25.3

0.78

FBW (kg)

39.3 ± 5.3

40.5 ± 3.3

42.2 ± 5.0

39.0 ± 5.3

Ῡ = 40.2

0.95

DWG (kg d−1)

0.25 ± 0.1

0.33 ± 0.1

0.37 ± 0.1

0.32 ± 0.1

Ῡ = 0.32

0.21

FC

5.1 ± 0.3

4.5 ± 0.8

3.9 ± 0.8

4.4 ± 1.0

Ῡ = 4.5

0.15

BCS1

3.2 ± 0.3

3.0 ± 0.3

3.1 ± 0.2

3.1 ± 0.3

Ῡ = 3.1

0.70

1Body condition score: 1 = very poor – 5 = very fat

The positive response to WBG recorded in our experiment was c.a. twofold that observed by McCarthy et al. [26], who worked similar lambs, but this difference was probably due to the higher energy content of control treatment in their experiment. In other experiment an improvement on the body weight gain was resported until a 50% substitution rate of lucerne hay by dried brewers grains [27].

Conclusion

The main objective of this work was to assess the voluntary intake and animal performance of intensive reared lambs fed with WBG in replacement of sorghum silage.

The WBG had higher concentrations of CP and EE than Sorghum silage, and its chemical composition was typical of these brazilian by-products. Substituion of sorghum silage by WBG did not change lambs’ feed DMI, DWG and FC.

Abbreviations

ADF: 

Acid detergent fiber

ADL: 

Acid detergent lignin

aNDFom: 

Neutral Detergent Fiber assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash

BW: 

Body weight

CP: 

Crude Protein

CRD: 

Complete randomized experimental design

DM: 

Dry matter

DWG: 

Daily weight gain

EE: 

Ether extract

FC: 

Feed conversion

ME: 

Metabolizable energy

NDF: 

Neutral Detergent Fiber

NEL: 

Net energy for lactation

NFC: 

Non-fibrous carbohydrates

NRC: 

National Research Council

OM: 

Organic matter

TCH: 

Total carbohydrates

TDN: 

Total Digestible Nutrients

UFSM: 

Federal University of Santa Maria

WBG: 

Wet brewer’s grains

WBG-C: 

Wet brewer’s grains-ground corn mixture

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

Authors approved the data and materials availability.

Authors’ contributions

FMF was mainly carried out this study and drafted the manuscript. MAM, SMM, MJH and TWS were participated in the feeding trial, together. CS conceived of the study, performed the statistical analysis, participated in its coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the Ethics Committee on Animal Use provided by the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (Protocol N° 037/2014).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria – UFSM, Santa Maria, Brasil
(2)
School of Agriculture - Department of Animal Science, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

  1. Ortiz JS, et al. Efeito de diferentes níveis de proteína bruta na ração sobre o desempenho e as características de carcaça de cordeiros terminados em creep feeding. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2005;34:2390–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. De Sá CO, et al. Aspectos técnicos e econômicos da terminação de cordeiros a pasto e em confinamento. III Simpósio Int. Sobre Caprinos e Ovinos Corte; 2007. p. 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Silva VB, et al. Resíduo úmido de cervejaria na alimentação de cabras. R Bras Zootec. 2010;39:1595–99.Google Scholar
  4. Lima ML. Resíduo de cervejaria úmido: formas de conservação e efeitos sobre parâmetros ruminais. Piracicaba: Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade de São Paulo; 1993. p. 98.Google Scholar
  5. West JW, Ely LO, Martin SA. Wet brewers grains for lactating dairy-cows during hot, humid weather. J. Dairy Sci. 1994;77:196–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jefferies BC. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian J. Agr. 1961;32:19–21.Google Scholar
  7. Osório JC, et al. Produção de carne ovina, alternativa para o Rio Grande do Sul. Pelotas: Editora Universitária/UFPel; 1998.Google Scholar
  8. NRC. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new worlds camelids. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  9. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 15th ed. VA: AOAC International; 1990.Google Scholar
  10. Van Soest P, Robertson J, Lewis B. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysacchararides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mertens DR, et al. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 2002;85:1217–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists - A.O.A.C. Official methods of analysis. (16th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Senger CCD, et al. Evaluation of autoclave procedures for fibre analysis in forage and concentrate feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008;146:169–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. NFTA, 2007. National Forage Testing Association. http://foragetesting.org/ (accessed 10 Feb 2018).
  15. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. New York: Cornell University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  16. Statistical Analysis System. SAS/STAT® 9.1. Cary: User’s guide; 2013.Google Scholar
  17. Feedipedia, 2014. Animal feed resources information system. https://feedipedia.org/node/74/ (accessed 8 Jan 2018).Google Scholar
  18. Valadares Filho, S.C., et al., 2015. CQBAL 3.0. Tabelas Brasileiras de Composição de Alimentos para Bovinos. http://cqbal.agropecuaria.ws/webcqbal/index.php/ (accessed 3 Jan 2018).
  19. Kozloski GV, et al. Níveis de fibra em detergente neutro na dieta de cordeiros: consumo, digestibilidade e fermentação ruminal. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2006;58:893–900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Geron LJV, et al. Consumo, digestibilidade dos nutrientes, produção e composição do leite de vacas alimentadas com resíduo de cervejaria fermentado. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2010;32:69–76. http://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/6990/ (accessed 6 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  21. Belibasakis NG, Tsirgogianni D. Effects of wet brewers grains on milk yield, milk composition and blood components of dairy cows in hot weather. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. [Internet]. 1996;57:175–81. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377840195008608/ (accessed 6 Jan 2018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wen-Shyg Chiou P, et al. Wet brewers’ grains or bean curd pomance as partial replacement of soybean meal for lactating cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1998;74:123–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, G.L. Suplementação de gordura na dieta como estratégia para aumento da eficiência reprodutiva em bovinos. In: Curso novos enfoques na produção e reprodução de bovinos, 5, 2001, Uberlândia, MG. Anais... Uberlândia: Conapec Jr.; Botucatu: UNESP, p.95–101, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Clark JH, et al. Suplying the protein needs for dairy cattle from by-products feeds. J. Dairy Sci., Champaing. 1987;70(5):1092–109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Satter LD. Protein and fiber digestion, passage and utilization in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci., Champaign. 1986;69(10):2734–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. McCarthy FD, et al. Utilization of an ensiled wet brewer’s grains-corn mixture by growing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1990;28:29–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bovolenta S, et al. The utilization of diets containing increasing levels of dried brewers’ grains by growing lambs. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 1998;66:689–95. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1357729800009267/ (accessed 6 Jan 2018View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement