Research
Open Access

Effects of different physical forms of concentrate on performance, carcass characteristics, and economic analysis in hanwoo steers

  • Sung Il Kim1,
  • Bo cheon Seo2,
  • In Surk Jang2,
  • Ouk Kim3,
  • Chang Bon Choi4 and
  • Keun Ki Jung5Email author
Journal of Animal Science and Technology201456:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/2055-0391-56-9

©  Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

Received: 25 April 2014

Accepted: 8 May 2014

Published: 28 July 2014

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the effects of different forms of concentrate fed to Hanwoo steers on performance, carcass characteristics, and economic performance. Forty-two Hanwoo steers (average age of 5.1 ± 0.8 mo. with body weight of 147.05 ± 10.85 kg) were randomly allotted into FC (animals fed flakes for entire experimental period) and GC (animals fed grounded concentrate during growing and fattening phases followed by flaked concentrate during finishing phase) groups for 758 d after reaching an age of 30.0 ± 0.82 mo. There was no difference in body weight (BW) or ADG between the treatments until fattening (15 ~ 22 mo.) phase. However, by finishing phase (23 ~ 30 mo.), the GC group (739.24 kg BW and 0.67 kg ADG) showed greater (P < 0.05) BW and ADG than the FC group (702.93 kg BW and 0.59 kg ADG). Steers in the GC group also showed greater (P < 0.05) BW and ADG than the FC group throughout the entire experimental period (5 ~ 30 mo.). There was no significant difference in carcass weight or backfat thickness between the treatments. M. Longissimus dorsi area of the GC group (91.00 cm2) was greater (P < 0.05) than that of the FC group (83.59 cm2). Marbling score and percentage of 1++ meat quality grade were 14.0 and 48.0% higher in the GC group compared to the FC group. There was no significant difference in physicochemical characteristics, including moisture and crude protein levels, between the treatments. Gross income per head excluding operating expenses was 59.3% greater in the GC group (1,647,512 won) compared to the FC group (1,034,343 won).

Keywords

Hanwoo steers Flaked concentrate Grounded concentrate Economic performance

Background

The current trend in feeding systems for Hanwoo steers in Korea involves administration of animal feeds in the form of pellets or flakes rather than as grounded feeds. Pellets are formed by grounding and compressing raw ingredients into the shape of a pellet while flakes are processed using high heat and pressure. Hanwoo steers are fed grain-oriented compound feeds to increase their intake and efficiency[1]. However, production costs of Hanwoo farms are rapidly increasing due to skyrocketing prices of grains and animal feeds. As such, there is increasing demand to fortify the competitiveness of the Hanwoo industry by cutting down on production costs, and the most effective method may be simplifying the entire animal feed process. Processing of feedstuffs increases the gelatinization and digestibility of starch, ultimately improving feed efficiency[2]. Gelatinization of starch can be increased by pelleting and flaking by 35% and 50%, repectively[3, 4]. The range of this processing effect and feed efficiency depend on the type of grain, processing method, origin of feed ingredients, and breeding period of cattle[5, 6]. Therefore, it is necessary to appropriately adjust the processing method of feed with regard to the breeding period of Hanwoo steers. To this end, this study investigated the effects of administration of various physical forms of grain feed during different feeding phases on performance, carcass characteristics, and economic performance in Hanwoo steers, thereby reducing production costs with efficient feed processing methods.

Materials and methods

Experimental animals and design

Forty-two Hanwoo steers (average age of 5.1 ± 0.8 mo. with body weight of 147.05 ± 10.85 kg) were randomly allotted into FC (animals fed flakes for entire experimental period; growing, fattening, and finishing phases, 5 ~ 30 mo. of age) and GC (animals fed grounded concentrate during growing, 5 ~ 14 mo. of age, and fattening phases, 15 ~ 22 mo. of age, followed by flakes during finishing phase, 23 ~ 30 mo. of age). Hanwoo steers in the FC (18 steers divided into three pens) and GC (24 steers divided into four pens) groups were administered the assigned diets for 758 d after reaching an age of 30.0 ± 0.82 mo. (Table 1). The animals were sacrificed for meat production and parts of the carcass were used for the analysis with consent from the farmers in this study.
Table 1

Feeding regimen of concentrate diet for the entire experiment

Treatment

Phases

Growing1)

Fattening2)

Finishing3)

FC

Flaked & pelleted diet

Flaked & pelleted diet

Flaked & pelleted diet

GC

Ground diet

Ground diet

Flaked & pelleted diet

1)Feeding period: 5.1 to 13.9 months of age.

2)Feeding period: 13.9 to 22.1 months of age.

3)Feeding period: 22.1 to 30.0 months of age.

Experimental diets

Experimental diets were formulated by an animal feed manufacturing company located in Kimhae, Korea. Roughages used in this study included timothy, alfalfa, and tall fescue. Chemical compositions of the experimental diets are shown in Table 2 (concentrate) and3 (roughage). Table 4 shows the physicochemical characteristics of corns. Amounts of concentrate and roughages used in the experimental diets were determined by considering the growth stage and nutrient requirements of the animals (Table 5).
Table 2

Chemical composition of concentrate diets

Composition

Concentrate

Growing

Fattening

Finishing

 

Flaked

Ground

Flaked

Ground

Flaked

Flaked

 

─────────%, as - fed ──────────

Moisture

11.78 ± 0.121)

11.82 ± 0.05

12.67 ± 0.06

12.90 ± 0.04

12.59 ± 0.09

12.59 ± 0.09

Crude protein

16.22 ± 0.01

16.33 ± 0.02

15.33 ± 0.04

15.18 ± 0.03

13.26 ± 0.03

13.26 ± 0.03

Crude fat

3.06 ± 0.01

2.63 ± 0.04

3.03 ± 0.03

3.19 ± 0.04

3.17 ± 0.06

3.17 ± 0.06

Crude fiber

11.74 ± 0.25

13.13 ± 0.08

10.15 ± 0.06

10.17 ± 0.10

9.24 ± 0.39

9.24 ± 0.39

Crude ash

5.44 ± 0.06

6.03 ± 0.05

4.89 ± 0.02

5.04 ± 0.06

4.57 ± 0.20

4.57 ± 0.20

NFE

51.76 ± 1.61

50.06 ± 1.32

53.93 ± 1.11

53.52 ± 1.46

57.17 ± 0.95

57.17 ± 0.95

Ca

0.77 ± 0.04

0.66 ± 0.01

0.59 ± 0.01

0.63 ± 0.02

0.54 ± 0.06

0.54 ± 0.06

P

0.45 ± 0.00

0.44 ± 0.00

0.40 ± 0.00

0.43 ± 0.00

0.41 ± 0.02

0.41 ± 0.02

NDF2)

29.04 ± 0.36

33.54 ± 0.21

26.06 ± 0.07

25.33 ± 0.07

27.85 ± 1.37

27.85 ± 1.37

ADF3)

16.18 ± 0.19

15.63 ± 0.24

14.75 ± 0.10

14.34 ± 0.07

13.58 ± 0.38

13.58 ± 0.38

TDN4)

68.0

68.0

70.0

70.0

72.0

72.0

1)Means ± standard error.

2)Neutral derergent fiber.

3)Acid detergent fiber.

4)Calculated.

Table 3

Chemical composition of roughages

Composition

Roughages

Timothy hay

Alfalfa hay

Tall fescue straw

Ryegrass straw

 

─────%, as-fed basis ────

Moisture

8.22 ± 0.071)

9.64 ± 0.18

9.76 ± 0.44

7.72 ± 0.04

Crude protein

7.87 ± 0.18

17.79 ± 0.16

7.06 ± 0.59

5.39 ± 0.16

Crude fat

1.89 ± 0.02

1.97 ± 0.02

0.77 ± 0.00

1.10 ± 0.05

Crude fiber

32.77 ± 0.28

27.71 ± 0.32

32.57 ± 1.63

32.34 ± 0.19

Crude ash

6.37 ± 0.12

9.20 ± 0.10

5.97 ± 0.76

5.82 ± 0.07

NFE2)

42.88 ± 0.74

33.69 ± 0.97

43.87 ± 2.54

47.63 ± 0.19

Ca

0.28 ± 0.00

1.48 ± 0.02

0.20 ± 0.01

0.36 ± 0.01

P

0.16 ± 0.00

0.22 ± 0.00

0.08 ± 0.01

0.13 ± 0.00

NDF3)

59.99 ± 0.30

37.70 ± 0.43

59.42 ± 1.93

60.88 ± 0.10

ADF4)

34.36 ± 0.23

30.71 ± 0.68

34.20 ± 1.78

34.45 ± 0.15

TDN5)

54.61

53.55

34.18

52.82

1)Means ± standard error.

2)Nitrogen-free extract.

3)Neutral derergent fiber.

4)Acid detergent fiber.

5)Calculated.

Table 4

Physicochemical characteristics and distribution of particle size in flake and grounded corns

Items

Flaked corn

Ground corn

Flake thickness1), mm

3.29 ± 0.042)

―

Starch gelatinization3),%

31.93 ± 1.69

―

Density, g/ℓ

506.8 ± 2.0

693.5 ± 2.5

Particle size4),%

  

Sieve mesh

  

6 ~ 8

―

36.1 ± 2.8

14 ~ 18

―

45.3 ± 4.3

25 ~ 40

―

10.9 ± 1.3

60 ~ 100

―

6.2 ± 0.6

Under 100

―

1.5 ± 0.4

1)Measured by vernier calipers.

2)Means ± standard error.

3)Determined by diastase method.

4)Percents retained on screen.

Table 5

Feeding program for Hanwoo steers in the experiment

Fattening phase

Age in mon.

Body weight range (kg)

Daily gain (kg)

Feeding level (body weight,%)

Concentrate fed (kg/hd/d, as-fed basis)

Roughage fed (kg/hd/d, as-fed basis)

Growing

Fattening

Finishing

Timothy hay

Alfalfa hay

Straw

Growing

5

147 ~ 162

0.50

0.90

1.4

 

1.5

0.5

 

6

162 ~ 188

0.85

1.25

2.0

  

2.0

1.0

 

7

188 ~ 214

0.85

1.40

2.6

  

3.0

1.0

 

8

214 ~ 241

0.90

1.50

3.2

  

3.4

1.0

 

9

241 ~ 268

0.90

1.50

3.6

  

3.5

1.0

 

10

268 ~ 295

0.90

1.53

4.1

  

4.0

1.0

 

11

295 ~ 322

0.90

1.55

4.6

  

4.0

1.0

 

12

322 ~ 351

0.95

1.61

5.2

  

4.5

0.5

 

13

351 ~ 379

0.95

1.70

6.0

  

4.5

0.5

 

Fattening

14

379 ~ 408

0.95

1.84

3.5

3.5

 

4.5

  

15

408 ~ 436

0.95

1.96

 

8.0

 

3.5

 

0.5

16

436 ~ 466

1.00

2.06

 

9.0

   

3.0

17

466 ~ 496

1.00

2.08

 

9.7

   

3.0

18

496 ~ 526

1.00

2.02

 

10.0

   

2.5

19

526 ~ 553

0.90

1.90

 

10.0

   

2.3

20

553 ~ 579

0.85

1.81

 

10.0

   

2.0

21

579 ~ 604

0.85

1.73

 

10.0

   

1.5

22

604 ~ 628

0.80

1.66

 

10.0

   

1.5

Finishing

23

628 ~ 649

0.70

1.51

  

9.5

  

1.3

24

649 ~ 667

0.60

1.39

  

9.0

  

1.2

25

667 ~ 682

0.50

1.35

  

9.0

  

1.2

26

682 ~ 696

0.45

1.25

  

8.5

  

1.2

27

696 ~ 708

0.40

1.22

  

8.5

  

1.2

28

708 ~ 718

0.35

1.13

  

8.0

  

1.2

29

718 ~ 727

0.30

1.11

  

8.0

  

1.2

 

30

727 ~ 736

0.30

1.03

  

7.5

  

1.2

Feeding management

Each treatment group was placed in a 5.0 m × 10.0 m pen (six animals per pen) and administered the assigned diets twice per day. All animals had ad libitum access to water. Feed intake was recorded every day, and animals were weighed every month throughout the experiment. Animals were cared and managed according to Korean traditional farm regulations.

Meat quality measurement

At the end of the experimental period, animals were fasted for 24 h, weighed, and slaughtered at a commercial abattoir located in Ansung, Kyunggi province, Korea. Carcass measurement were obtained after chilling for 24 h at 4°C. Carcass yield and quality were graded by meat graders using the criteria provided by Livestock Quality Assessment[7].

Evaluation of carcass chemical composition

a. Chemical composition

Chemical composition, including moisture, ash, crude protein, and fat contents, were analyzed according to the AOAC methodology[8]. Moisture content (%) of loin muscle samples (2 g) was measured by homogenizing and drying samples at 105°C in an oven and then measuring weight loss after drying. Total lipids were analyzed by the soxhelt extraction method. Crude protein content was measured by the Kjeldahl method. Briefly, 0.5 g of loin samples was digested at 450°C for 5 h, distilled by addition of 50% NaOH, and titrated with HCL, after which the total protein amount was calculated by multiplying% N by 6.25.

b. Meat color

Meat color, including Hunter L (lightness), a (redness), and b (yellowness), was determined by a Chroma Meter (CR-10, Minolta Corporation, LTD, Japan).

c. Melting point

Melting point was measured by the slip-point method. Briefly, lipids were extracted from meat samples by cutting them into small pieces with a Hanil Mini Cooking Cutter (Hanil electric co. HMC-150 T), homogenization with chloroform and methanol (2:1 v/v) solution, filtration, and then evaporation with nitrogen. Capillary tubes (100 mm, open) were filled to a height of 1 cm from one end and then placed in a freezer (−20°C) until lipids were firm (about 24 h). After removal from the freezer, the capillary tube was place on a warm incubator, and the temperature was increased at a rate of 1°C per min. with stirring until the lipids melted.

Economic analysis

We analyzed the economic values of Hanwoo steers used in this experiment by calculating the average carcass prices at four different slaughter points. Profits from by-products were also considered as economic values. Feed costs for both the concentrate and roughage used in this analysis were applied as the actual purchase price of the farm where this experiment was performed. Costs for purchasing the calves, bedding, medicine, utilities (water and heating), and castration were averaged based on the number of animals used in this experiment.

Statistics

Data was analyzed by t-test of SAS[9]. Probability values less than 0.05% were considered significant. Data of feed intake and feed conversion rate from the breeding group were excluded from the significance test.

Results and discussion

Performance

Changes in body weight (BW) and ADG in steers fed the experimental diets are shown in Table 6. There was no significant difference in BW or ADG between the treatments during growing (5 ~ 14 mo.) and fattening (15 ~ 22 mo.) phases. However, by finishing phase (23 ~ 30 mo.), the GC group (739.24 kg BW and 0.67 kg ADG) showed greater (P < 0.05) BW and ADG than the FC group (702.93 kg BW and 0.59 kg ADG). Consistent with this result, steers in the GC group also showed greater (P < 0.05) BW and ADG than the FC group throughout the entire experimental period (5 ~ 30 mo.). There was no significant difference in feed intake for either concentrate or roughage between the treatments during growing and fattening phases (Table 7). Feed intake for concentrate was 7.4% higher in the GC group compared to the FC group, whereas the feed conversion rate was 6.7% lower in the GC group compared to the FC group during finishing phase. The GC group showed a 3.0% greater feed intake for concentrate as well as a 3.3% lower feed conversion rate compared to the FC group for the entire experimental period. There was no significant difference in feed intake for roughage between the treatment groups. These results indicate that the physical form of concentrate have no affect on the ADG or feed intake of steers during growing and fattening phases. Zinn and Barajas[10] also reported that steers administered various densities of corn and barley for 86 d showed no difference in body weight gain or ADG. Consistent with these results, administration of various densities of sorghum flakes (412, 360, 309, and 257 g/L) did not affect the ADG of steers during growing phase[11]. However, in our study, steers from the GC group during finishing phase showed higher (P < 0.05) BW and ADG than those from the FC group. This result might be associated increased feed intake in the GC group. Furthermore, in a previous report, steers fed mashed concentrate during growing phase and then switched to flaked concentrate during finishing phase showed a greater (by 0.98 kg) ADG compared to those fed flaked concentrate for the entire period[12]. Flaking improves the feed conversion rate by inducing gelatinization of starch[13]. On the other hand, administration of flaked concentrate for the entire feeding period may decrease feed intake by reducing the rumen pH, which is associated with accelerated degradation of starch[14]. Taken together, feeding steers grounded concentrate during growing and fattening phases and then switching to flaked concentrate finishing phase effectively improved ADG and feed intake.
Table 6

Body weight and daily gain of Hanwoo steers by treatment

Items

FC1)

GC2)

T-test3)

 No. of heads

18

24

 

 Body weight (kg)

   

  Initial (5 mo)

146.7 ± 1.35

147.4 ± 0.99

0.9253

Growing (14 mo)

370.7 ± 1.81

374.5 ± 1.22

0.6985

  Fattening (22 mo)

562.2 ± 2.47

575.1 ± 1.90

0.2297

  Finishing (30 mo)

702.9 ± 2.90

739.2 ± 2.67

0.0483

 Average daily gain (kg)

   

  Growing phase

0.84 ± 0.00

0.85 ± 0.00

0.6629

  Fattening phase

0.77 ± 0.01

0.80 ± 0.01

0.3220

  Finishing phase

0.59 ± 0.00

0.67 ± 0.01

0.0548

  Overall period

0.73 ± 0.00

0.78 ± 0.00

0.0414

1)Growing (flaked & pelleted diet), fattening (flaked & pelleted diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

2)Growing (ground diet), fattening (ground diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

3)Probability of the T test.

Table 7

Feed intake and feed conversion in Hanwoo steers

Items

FC1)

GC2)

Growing phase

  

 Feed intake (kg/head/day)

  

  Concentrate

3.52

3.53

  Timothy hay

2.60

2.78

  Alfalfa hay

0.68

0.70

  Sub-total

3.28

3.48

 Feed conversion, kg/kg

8.14

8.27

Fattening phase

  

 Feed intake (kg/head/day)

  

  Concentrate

7.91

7.89

  Timothy hay

1.01

0.91

  Tall fescue straw

0.80

0.99

  Ryegrass straw

0.10

-

  Sub-total

1.91

1.89

 Feed conversion, kg/kg

12.83

12.19

Finishing phase

  

 Feed intake (kg/head/day)

  

  Concentrate

7.80

8.38

  Tall fescue straw

-

1.23

  Ryegrass straw

1.23

-

  Sub-total

1.23

1.23

 Feed conversion, kg/kg

15.39

14.38

Overall period

  

 Feed intake (kg/head/day)

  

  Concentrate

6.32

6.50

  Timothy hay

1.25

1.28

  Alfalfa hay

0.24

0.25

  Tall fescue straw

0.26

0.72

  Ryegrass straw

0.42

-

  Sub-total

2.18

2.25

 Feed conversion, kg/kg

11.59

11.22

1)Growing (flaked & pelleted diet), fattening (flaked & pelleted diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

2)Growing (ground diet), fattening (ground diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

Carcass characteristics

Carcass weight, backfat thickness, M. Longissimus dorsi area, marbling score, and meat color of Hanwoo steers fed the experimental diets are shown in Table 8. Carcass weight of the GC group (4229.57 kg) was numerically, but not statistically, higher than that of the FC group (405.94 kg). There was no significant difference in backfat thickness between the treatments. M. Longissimus dorsi area of the GC group (91.00cm2) was greater (P < 0.05) than that of the FC group (83.592). Marbling score, which is a meat quality trait, was 18.4% higher in the GC group (6.96) compared to the FC group (5.88). No difference was found in meat color, fat color, texture, or maturity between the treatments. The GC group showed a higher percentage of 1++ grade (43.5%) compared to the FC group (29.4%) by 48%. Percentage of quality grade over 1+ grade was also higher in the GC group (87%) than in the FC group (29.4%) by 50%. Brandt et al[15] also reported that supplementation of steam-flaked corn to steers increases the M. Longissimus dorsi area. However, carcass weight and backfat thickness are not affected by densities of flaked corn[16]. Moreover, consistent with our current results, NIAS[12] reported that administration of powdered concentrate during fattening phase followed by flaked concentrate during finishing phase to steers increased the marbling score by 13.3% compared to the flake-fed group for the entire period. In the current study, steers in the GC group showed improved M. Longissimus dorsi area and marbling score.
Table 8

Effects of physical forms of concentrate on carcass characteristics in Hanwoo steers

Items

FC1)

GC2)

T- test3)

Yield traits

   

Cold carcass, kg

405.94 ± 2.084)

429.57 ± 1.67

0.0542

Backfat thickness, mm

16.88 ± 0.26

17.96 ± 0.22

0.4892

Longissmus muscle area, cm2

83.59 ± 0.48

91.00 ± 0.44

0.0178

Yield index

62.30 ± 0.17

61.71 ± 0.14

0.5568

Yield grade,%

   

A

0.05)

0.0

 

B

58.8

47.8

 

C

41.2

52.2

 

Quality traits

   

Marbling score6)

5.88 ± 0.12

6.96 ± 0.06

0.0650

Meat color7)

4.88 ± 0.02

4.65 ± 0.02

0.1014

Fat color8)

2.94 ± 0.01

2.78 ± 0.02

0.1735

Texture9)

1.24 ± 0.03

1.04 ± 0.01

0.0729

Maturity10)

2.35 ± 0.03

2.57 ± 0.02

0.1931

Quality grade,%

   

1++

29.4

43.5

 

1+

29.4

43.5

 

1

17.7

8.7

 

2

23.5

4.3

 

1)Growing (flaked & pelleted diet), fattening (flaked & pelleted diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

2)Growing (ground diet), fattening (ground diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

3)Probability of the T test. 4)Mean ± Standard error.

5)Value in parentheses represents percentage of total heads.

6)9 = the most abundant, 1 = devoid. 7)7 = dark red, 1 = bright.

8)7 = yellowish, 1 = white.. 9)3 = Coarse, 1 = fine. 10)9 = mature, 1 = youthful.

Physicochemical characteristics of carcass

Effects of various physical forms of feeds on the physicochemical characteristics of Hanwoo steers are shown in Table 9. Moisture levels of the M. Longissimus dorsi muscle from steers in the FC and GC groups were 62.91 and 61.48%, respectively. Contents of crude protein in M. Longissimus dorsi muscle from steers in the FC and GC groups were 19.35 and 18.75%, respectively. Crude fat content of the GC group (18.37%) was greater than that of the FC group (15.90%) by 15.5%. The overall range of measured CIE values, including L (lightness), b (yellowness), and h (color), were greater (P < 0.05) in the GC group compared to the FC group. Physicochemical properties of meat are normally affected by moisture and crude fat content[17]. Levels of crude fat and CIE values (L) increase while moisture and crude proten content decrease with an increase in meat quality[18, 19]. Physicochemical characteristics of beef might be preferentially related to meat quality grade rather than the physical form or processing method of feed[20]. Melting point of carcass fat was highest in perirenal fat, followed by intramuscular fat and then subcutaneous fat (Table 10). Although not significant, the melting points of subcutaneous fat and intramuscular fat were lower in the GC group compared to the FC group by 4.0 and 3.0%, respectively. Carcass fat melting point was the greatest in perireral fat, followed by intramuscular fat and then subcutaneous fat. Melting point is highly correlated with fatty acid composition rather than the type or processing method of feed[21]; a higher fatty acid content is associated with a lower melting point and vice versa[22]. Taken together, the GC group with a high marbling score and meat quality grade showed higher carcass physiocochemical properties, including crude fat content and CIE.
Table 9

Effects of physical forms of concentrate on physicochemical characteristics of M.longissimus dorsi muscle in Hanwoo steers

Items

FC1)

GC2)

T- test3)

Moisture,%

62.91 ± 0.194)

61.48 ± 0.17

0.2246

Crude fat,%

15.90 ± 0.28

18.37 ± 0.22

0.1240

Crude protein,%

19.35 ± 0.06

18.75 ± 0.05

0.1058

CIE value:5)

   

L

40.43 ± 0.10

43.35 ± 0.07

0.0016

a

23.35 ± 0.06

23.81 ± 0.04

0.3895

b

11.10 ± 0.03

11.77 ± 0.02

0.0242

chroma

25.76 ± 0.06

26.60 ± 0.05

0.1604

hue

25.36 ± 0.04

26.60 ± 0.02

0.0120

Cooking loss,%

29.79 ± 0.05

28.62 ± 0.07

0.2096

1)Growing (flaked & pelleted diet), fattening (flaked & pelleted diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

2)Growing (ground diet), fattening (ground diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

3)Probability of the T test.

4)Means ± standard error.

5)L = lightness, a = redness, b = yellowness.

Table 10

Effects of physical forms of concentrate on melting point of carcass fat in Hanwoo steers

Items

FC1)

GC2)

T- test3)

Perirenal fat

38.82 ± 0.054)

39.49 ± 0.03

0.5825

Subcutaneous fat

21.39 ± 0.03

20.54 ± 0.02

0.3142

Intramuscular fat

26.81 ± 0.05

26.02 ± 0.02

0.6595

1)Growing (flaked & pelleted diet), fattening (flaked & pelleted diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

2)Growing (ground diet), fattening (ground diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

3)Probability of the T test.

4)Means ± standard error.

Economic analysis

Effects of various physical forms of concentrate on profitability are shown in Table 11. Carcass sale price for the FC and GC groups were 6,036,373 and 6,667,053 won (KRW), repectively. Carcass and by-product sale prices of the GC group were greater than those of the FC group by 10.0%. Total operating expenses, including calf purchase expenses, feed, slaughter, and other expenses, increased by 0.5% in the GC group (5,360,702 won) compared to the FC group (5,334,848 won). Gross income per head excluding operating expenses was 59.3% greater in the GC group (1,647,512 won) compared to the FC group (1,034,343 won). This increase in total revenue in the GC group can be attributed to an elevated carcass weight and percentage of meat grade above 1+. Total operating expenses in the GC group were 7.5% greater than those in the FC group due to increased feed intake following replacement of grounded feed by flaked concentrate during finishing phase. Operating expenses in the GC group were also higher due to elevated slaughter expenses due to increased carcass weight. In conclusion, administration of grounded concentrate during growing and fattening phases followed by flaked concentrate during finishing phase improves the profit and productivity of Hanwoo steers.
Table 11

Effects of physical forms of concentrate on profits in Hanwoo steers

Items

FC1)

GC2)

Cold carcass, Kg

405.94 ± 2.083)

429.57 ± 1.67

1. Gross income(A)

  

  Carcass sales4)

6,036,373.19

6,667,053.48

  By-product sales5)

332,818

341,162

  Total income

6,369,191.19

7,008,215.48

2. Operating cost(B)

  

  Calves

2,430,952

2,430,952

  Concentrate6)

1,226,259.2

1,226,740.2

  Roughage7)

576,954.3

593,850.3

  Butchery expense8)

227,044

235,522

  Self-help funds

20,000

20,000

  Miscellaneous expenses9)

853,638

853,638

  Total cost

5,334,847.5

5,360,702.5

3. Profit(A-B)

1,034,343.69

1,647,512.98

1)Growing (flaked & pelleted diet), fattening (flaked & pelleted diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

2)Growing (ground diet), fattening (ground diet) & finishing (flaked & pelleted diet).

3)Means ± standard error.

4)Carcass price, won/Kg: 1++B = 17,413, 1+B = 15,133, 1B = 14,290, 1++C = 16,507, 1+C 14,398, 1 = 13,570, 2 13,330, 2 12,370.

5)Includes intestines, head, legs, hide, blood, and inedible fat.

6)Concentrate price, won/kg : Growing(F) = 266.8, Growing(M) = 256.0, Fattening(F) = 264.0,

Fattening(M) = 253.2, Finishing(F) = 241.6

7)Roughage price, won/Kg: Timothy hay = 407, Alfalfa hay = 360, Tall fescue straw = 240, Ryegrass straw = 240.

8)Butchery expense: tax, dissection operation, stamp duty, inspection & grading fee.

9)Miscellaneous expenses: hired labor, bedding materials, electricity, transport, water service & veterinary & medicine.

Conclusion

This study was performed to investigate the effects of different forms of concentrate fed to Hanwoo steers on performance, carcass characteristics, and economic performance. In conclusion, it is plausible that feeding steers grounded concentrate during growing and fattening phases followed by flaked concentrate during finishing phase can improve ADG and feed intake. This feeding strategy increases the profit and productivity Hanwoo steers.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Songchon farmers for their support during this study and for time spent during sampling and examination.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Science, Gyeonbuk Provincial College
(2)
Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technolony
(3)
Department of Animal Science, Dong-A University
(4)
Department of Biotechnolony, Yeungnam University
(5)
Moksan Hanwoo Reserch Institute

References

  1. Jeong J, Jin GL, Shinekhuu J, Ji BJ, Song MK: Effect of method on nutrient availability in ruminants. Bull Biotechnol. 2009, 2: 13-21.Google Scholar
  2. Hale WH, Cuitun L, Saba WJ, Taylor B, Theurer B: Effect of steam processing and flaking milo and barley on performance and digestion by steers. J Anim Sci. 1966, 25: 392-396.Google Scholar
  3. Han YK, Maeng WJ, Park GK, Paik IK, Ohh SJ, Choi YJ: Feed Processings. 1993, 473-475. Seoul Korea: Sun Jin Mun Hwa SaGoogle Scholar
  4. Theurer CB, Lozano O, Alio A, Delgado-Elorduy A, Sadik M, Huber JT, Zinn RA: Steam-processed corn and sorghum grain flaked at different densities alter ruminal, small intestinal, and total tract digestibility of starch by steers. J Anim Sci. 1999, 77: 2824-2831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Neock JE, Tamminga S: Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. J Dairy Sci. 1991, 74: 3598-3629. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78552-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill EJ, Gill DR: The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review. J Anim Sci. 1997, 75: 868-879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Livestock Quality Assessment: Grading of Carcasses of Methods, Standards and Enforcement. 2007Google Scholar
  8. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis. 1990, Arlington, Virginia USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemist, 15Google Scholar
  9. SAS: SAS User's Guide:Statistics. 2002, NC: SAS Institute Inc. CaryGoogle Scholar
  10. Zinn RA, Barajas R: Influence of flake density on the comparative feeding value of a barley-corn blend for feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. 1997, 75: 904-909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Swingle RS, Eck TP, Theurer CB, De la Llata N, Poore MG, Moore JA: Flake density of steam-processed sorghum grain alters performance and sites of digestibility by growing-finishing steers. J Anim Sci. 1999, 77: 1055-1065.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. National Institue of Aniamal Science: Development of technologies for production of high-quality beef from Hanwoo steers. Effects of Physical Form of Concentrate on Productivity of Hawoo by Feeding Period. 1998, 545-Google Scholar
  13. Theurer CB: Grain processing effect on starch utilization by ruminants. J Anim Sci. 1986, 63: 1649-1662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ministry of Ariculture, Food and Rural Affairs: Development of technologies to improve competitiveness of Hanwoo. Development of feeding program for production of high-quality beef from Hanwoo steers. 2005, 85-92.Google Scholar
  15. Brandt RT, Kuhl GL, Campbell RE, Kastner CL, Stroda SL: Effects of steam-flaked sorghum grain or corn and supplemental fat on feedlot performance, carcass traits, longissimus composition, and sensory properties of steers. J Anim Sci. 1992, 70: 343-348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hales KE, McMeniman JP, Leibovich J, Vasconcelos JT, Quinn MJ, May ML, DiLorenzo N, Smith DR, Galyean ML: Effects of varying bulk densities of steam-flaked corn and dietary roughage concentration on in vitro fermentation, performance, carcass quality, and acid–base balance measurements in finishing steers. J Anim Sci. 2010, 88 (3): 1135-1147. 10.2527/jas.2009-2400View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly RF, Fontenot JP, Graham PP, Wilkinson WS, Kineaid CM: Estimates of carcass composition of beef cattle fed at different plane of nutrition. J Anim Sci. 1968, 27: 620-627.Google Scholar
  18. Savell JW, Cross HR, Smith GC: Percentage ether extractable fat and moisture content of beef longissimus muscle as related to USDA marbling score. J Food Sci. 1986, 51: 838-840. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13946.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson JL, Dolezal HG, Ray FK, Morgan JB: Characterization of certified angus beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck. J Anim Sci. 2004, 82: 1437-1444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cameron PJ, Zembayashi M, Lunt DK, Mitsuhashi T, Mitsumoto M, Dzawa S, Smith SB: Relationship between Japanese Beef Marbling Standard and intramuscular lipid in the m. longissimus thoracis of Japanese Black and American Wagyu cattle. Meat Sci. 1994, 38: 361-364. 10.1016/0309-1740(94)90125-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wood JD: Fat deposition and the quality of fat tissue in meat animals. Fats in Animal Nutrition. Edited by: Wiseman J. 1984, 407-435.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Enser M, Wood JD: Proceeding of the 39th lnternational congress of meat Science and Technology. Effect of Time of Year on Fatty Acid Composition and Melting Point of UK Lamb. 1993, 74-2Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement